Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 23

1.

Colposcopy for the diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis.

Mitchell MF, Schottenfeld D, Tortolero-Luna G, Cantor SB, Richards-Kortum R.

Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Apr;91(4):626-31.

PMID:
9540955
2.

Fluorescence spectroscopy for diagnosis of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix.

Mitchell MF, Cantor SB, Ramanujam N, Tortolero-Luna G, Richards-Kortum R.

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;93(3):462-70. Review.

PMID:
10075001
3.

Screening for squamous intraepithelial lesions with fluorescence spectroscopy.

Mitchell MF, Cantor SB, Brookner C, Utzinger U, Schottenfeld D, Richards-Kortum R.

Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Nov;94(5 Pt 2):889-96. Review.

PMID:
10546779
4.

Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Arbyn M, Bergeron C, Klinkhamer P, Martin-Hirsch P, Siebers AG, Bulten J.

Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jan;111(1):167-77. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000296488.85807.b3. Review.

PMID:
18165406
5.

Colposcopy.

Pretorius RG, Belinson JL.

Minerva Ginecol. 2012 Apr;64(2):173-80. Review.

PMID:
22481626
6.

Chemoprevention trials in the cervix: design, feasibility, and recruitment.

Mitchell MF, Hittelman WN, Lotan R, Nishioka K, Tortolero-Luna G, Richards-Kortum R, Hong WK.

J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1995;23:104-12. Review.

PMID:
8747384
7.

Positive predictive rate of colposcopic examination of the cervix uteri: an overview of literature.

Hopman EH, Kenemans P, Helmerhorst TJ.

Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1998 Feb;53(2):97-106. Review.

PMID:
9487534
8.

In vivo fluorescence spectroscopy: potential for non-invasive, automated diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and use as a surrogate endpoint biomarker.

Richards-Kortum R, Mitchell MF, Ramanujam N, Mahadevan A, Thomsen S.

J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1994;19:111-9. Review.

PMID:
7823582
9.

Advances in colposcopy: new technologies to challenge current practice.

Leeson S.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:140-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.09.016. Epub 2014 Sep 16. Review.

PMID:
25282538
10.

See-and-treat strategy for diagnosis and management of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Cárdenas-Turanzas M, Follen M, Benedet JL, Cantor SB.

Lancet Oncol. 2005 Jan;6(1):43-50. Review. Erratum in: Lancet Oncol. 2005 Feb;6(2):67.

PMID:
15629275
11.

Alternative Colposcopy Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Hermens M, Ebisch RM, Galaal K, Bekkers RL.

Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128(4):795-803. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001613. Review.

PMID:
27607860
12.

The role of colposcopy in modern gynecology.

Dexeus S, Cararach M, Dexeus D.

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2002;23(4):269-77. Review.

PMID:
12214721
13.

Accuracy of colposcopy-directed punch biopsies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Underwood M, Arbyn M, Parry-Smith W, De Bellis-Ayres S, Todd R, Redman CW, Moss EL.

BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1293-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03444.x. Epub 2012 Aug 13. Review.

14.

New adjunctive methods for cervical cancer screening.

Schneider A, Zahm DM.

Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1996 Sep;23(3):657-73. Review.

PMID:
8869951
15.

[Possibilities of the TruScreen for screening of precancer and cancer of the uterine cervix].

Zlatkov V.

Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2009;48(6):46-50. Review. Bulgarian.

PMID:
20225497
16.

Association between bacterial vaginosis and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Gillet E, Meys JF, Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, De Sutter P, Temmerman M, Vanden Broeck D.

PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045201. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Review.

17.

Novel advancements in colposcopy: historical perspectives and a systematic review of future developments.

Adelman MR.

J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2014 Jul;18(3):246-60. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e3182a72170. Review.

PMID:
24633164
18.

Methodology of diagnostic tests in hepatology.

Christensen E.

Ann Hepatol. 2009 Jul-Sep;8(3):177-83. Review.

PMID:
19841495
19.

Evaluation of diagnostic tests.

Fardy JM.

Methods Mol Biol. 2009;473:127-36. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-385-1_7. Review.

PMID:
19160735
20.

A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.

Irwin RJ, Irwin TC.

Eur J Intern Med. 2011 Jun;22(3):230-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2010.12.012. Epub 2011 Jan 26. Review.

PMID:
21570638

Supplemental Content

Support Center