Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 9

2.

Correcting for the bias caused by exposure measurement error in epidemiological studies.

Fahey MT, Forbes AB, Hodge AM.

Respirology. 2014 Oct;19(7):979-84. doi: 10.1111/resp.12356. Review.

3.
4.

Methodological issues regarding confounding and exposure misclassification in epidemiological studies of occupational exposures.

Blair A, Stewart P, Lubin JH, Forastiere F.

Am J Ind Med. 2007 Mar;50(3):199-207. Review.

PMID:
17096363
5.

Approaches to uncertainty in exposure assessment in environmental epidemiology.

Spiegelman D.

Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:149-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103720. Review.

6.

Regression calibration method for correcting measurement-error bias in nutritional epidemiology.

Spiegelman D, McDermott A, Rosner B.

Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Apr;65(4 Suppl):1179S-1186S. Review.

PMID:
9094918
7.

Contemporary Occupational Carcinogen Exposure and Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Cumberbatch MG, Cox A, Teare D, Catto JW.

JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1282-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3209. Review. Erratum in: JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1224.

PMID:
26448641
8.

Measurement Error and Environmental Epidemiology: a Policy Perspective.

Edwards JK, Keil AP.

Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Mar;4(1):79-88. doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0125-4. Review.

PMID:
28138941
9.

Measurement error, biases, and the validation of complex models for blood lead levels in children.

Carroll RJ, Galindo CD.

Environ Health Perspect. 1998 Dec;106 Suppl 6:1535-9. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center