Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 36

1.

Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR.

JAMA. 1996 Oct 23-30;276(16):1339-41. Review.

PMID:
8861994
2.

Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB.

JAMA. 1996 Oct 16;276(15):1253-8. Review.

PMID:
8849754
3.

The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC.

JAMA. 1996 Oct 9;276(14):1172-7. Review.

PMID:
8827972
4.

Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.

Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L, Caro J, Mullins CD, Nuijten M, Orlewska E, Watkins J, Trueman P.

Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):336-47.

5.
6.

Is the societal perspective in cost-effectiveness analysis useful for decision makers?

Russell LB, Fryback DG, Sonnenberg FA.

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Sep;25(9):447-54. Review.

PMID:
10481813
7.

Cost-effectiveness analyses in orthopaedic sports medicine: a systematic review.

Nwachukwu BU, Schairer WW, Bernstein JL, Dodwell ER, Marx RG, Allen AA.

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1530-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514544684. Epub 2014 Aug 14. Review.

PMID:
25125693
8.

A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.

Forbes C, Shirran L, Bagnall AM, Duffy S, ter Riet G.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. Review.

9.

Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies. Recommendations from the panel on cost effectiveness in health and medicine. Panel on cost Effectiveness in Health and Medicine.

Siegel JE, Torrance GW, Russell LB, Luce BR, Weinstein MC, Gold MR.

Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Feb;11(2):159-68. Review.

PMID:
10172935
10.

Growth and quality of the cost-utility literature, 1976-2001.

Neumann PJ, Greenberg D, Olchanski NV, Stone PW, Rosen AB.

Value Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;8(1):3-9. Review.

11.

Cost-effectiveness analysis in the nursing literature, 1992-1996.

Allred CA, Arford PH, Mauldin PD, Goodwin LK.

Image J Nurs Sch. 1998;30(3):235-42. Review.

PMID:
9753838
12.

Impact of outcomes research on the management of vascular surgery patients.

Rectenwald JE, Upchurch GR Jr.

J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jun;45 Suppl A:A131-40. Review.

13.

NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.

Cunningham FG, Bangdiwala SI, Brown SS, Dean TM, Frederiksen M, Rowland Hogue CJ, King T, Spencer Lukacz E, McCullough LB, Nicholson W, Petit NF, Probstfield JL, Viguera AC, Wong CA, Zimmet SC.

NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010 Mar 10;27(3):1-42. Review.

14.

Quality and effectiveness issues related to oral health.

Antczak-Bouckoms A.

Med Care. 1995 Nov;33(11 Suppl):NS123-42. Review.

PMID:
7475425
15.

When is critical care medicine cost-effective? A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness literature.

Talmor D, Shapiro N, Greenberg D, Stone PW, Neumann PJ.

Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;34(11):2738-47. Review.

PMID:
16957636
16.

Systematic review and quality assessment of cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmaceutical therapies for advanced colorectal cancer.

Leung HW, Chan AL, Leung MS, Lu CL.

Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Apr;47(4):506-18. doi: 10.1345/aph.1R152. Epub 2013 Apr 2. Review.

PMID:
23548649
17.

Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of drug therapy.

Dao TD.

Am J Hosp Pharm. 1985 Apr;42(4):791-802. Review.

PMID:
3925768
18.

Cost effectiveness/utility analyses. Do current decision rules lead us to where we want to be?

Birch S, Gafni A.

J Health Econ. 1992 Oct;11(3):279-96. Review.

PMID:
10122540
19.

Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.

Burns T, Knapp M, Catty J, Healey A, Henderson J, Watt H, Wright C.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. Review.

20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center