Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 28

1.

Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.

Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Rubin SM, Sandrock C, Ernster VL.

JAMA. 1995 Jan 11;273(2):149-54.

PMID:
7799496
2.

Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Grimm LJ, Ghate S, Davidson B, Mongtomery RC, Crowley MJ, McCrory DC, Kendrick A, Sanders GD.

JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1406.

PMID:
26501537
3.

Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L.

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969. Epub 2016 Jan 12. Review.

PMID:
26756588
4.

Screening for prostate cancer.

Ilic D, Neuberger MM, Djulbegovic M, Dahm P.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3. Review.

PMID:
23440794
5.

The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies.

Broeders M, Moss S, Nyström L, Njor S, Jonsson H, Paap E, Massat N, Duffy S, Lynge E, Paci E; EUROSCREEN Working Group.

J Med Screen. 2012;19 Suppl 1:14-25. Review.

PMID:
22972807
6.

Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

Gøtzsche PC, Nielsen M.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Oct 18;(4):CD001877. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(4):CD001877.

PMID:
17054145
8.

Breast cancer screening in the older woman: an effective way to reduce mortality?

Paesmans M, Ameye L, Moreau M, Rozenberg S.

Maturitas. 2010 Jul;66(3):263-7. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.03.016. Epub 2010 May 6. Review.

PMID:
20451335
9.

A meta-analysis of mammographic screening with and without clinical breast examination.

Hamashima C, Ohta K, Kasahara Y, Katayama T, Nakayama T, Honjo S, Ohnuki K.

Cancer Sci. 2015 Jul;106(7):812-8. doi: 10.1111/cas.12693. Epub 2015 Jun 17. Review.

10.

Routine screening mammography in women older than 74 years: a review of the available data.

Galit W, Green MS, Lital KB.

Maturitas. 2007 Jun 20;57(2):109-19. Epub 2007 Mar 1. Review.

PMID:
17336004
11.
12.

Do community health worker interventions improve rates of screening mammography in the United States? A systematic review.

Wells KJ, Luque JS, Miladinovic B, Vargas N, Asvat Y, Roetzheim RG, Kumar A.

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Aug;20(8):1580-98. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0276. Epub 2011 Jun 8. Review.

13.

Mammographic screening in older women. Is it worthwhile?

van Dijck JA, Broeders MJ, Verbeek AL.

Drugs Aging. 1997 Feb;10(2):69-79. Review.

PMID:
9061265
14.

Mammographic screening of women aged 40-49 years. Benefit, risk, and cost considerations.

Feig SA.

Cancer. 1995 Nov 15;76(10 Suppl):2097-106. Review.

PMID:
8635007
15.

The number of women who would need to be screened regularly by mammography to prevent one death from breast cancer.

Beral V, Alexander M, Duffy S, Ellis IO, Given-Wilson R, Holmberg L, Moss SM, Ramirez A, Reed MW, Rubin C, Whelehan P, Wilson R, Young KC.

J Med Screen. 2011;18(4):210-2. doi: 10.1258/jms.2011.011134. Review.

16.

Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vernon SW, McQueen A, Tiro JA, del Junco DJ.

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jul 21;102(14):1023-39. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djq223. Epub 2010 Jun 29. Review.

17.

Mammographic screening: case-control studies.

Walter SD.

Ann Oncol. 2003 Aug;14(8):1190-2. Review.

PMID:
12881374
18.

[Breast cancer screening: current status and introduction as a preventive service].

von Fournier D, Anton HW, Junkermann H, Bastert G.

Zentralbl Gynakol. 1992;114(3):107-14. Review. German.

PMID:
1595304
19.

Will screening mammography in the East do more harm than good?

Leung GM, Lam TH, Thach TQ, Hedley AJ.

Am J Public Health. 2002 Nov;92(11):1841-6. Review.

20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center