Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 19

1.

A practice-based tool for engaging stakeholders in future research: a synthesis of current practices.

Guise JM, O'Haire C, McPheeters M, Most C, Labrant L, Lee K, Barth Cottrell EK, Graham E.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;66(6):666-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.12.010. Epub 2013 Mar 13. Review.

PMID:
23497857
2.

Engaging Stakeholders To Identify and Prioritize Future Research Needs [Internet].

O’Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto E, LaBrant L, Most C, Lee K, Graham E, Cottrell E, Guise JM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun.

3.

A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research.

Concannon TW, Fuster M, Saunders T, Patel K, Wong JB, Leslie LK, Lau J.

J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Dec;29(12):1692-701. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2878-x. Epub 2014 Jun 4. Review.

4.

Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, Hoomans T, Meltzer D, Noorani H, Robinson K, Schoelles K, Motu'apuaka M, Anderson J, Paynter R, Guise JM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Mar.

5.

Stakeholder assessment of comparative effectiveness research needs for Medicaid populations.

Fischer MA, Allen-Coleman C, Farrell SF, Schneeweiss S.

J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Sep;4(5):465-71. doi: 10.2217/cer.15.26. Epub 2015 Sep 21. Review.

PMID:
26388438
6.

Stakeholder priorities for comparative effectiveness research in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a workshop report.

Krishnan JA, Lindenauer PK, Au DH, Carson SS, Lee TA, McBurnie MA, Naureckas ET, Vollmer WM, Mularski RA; COPD Outcomes-based Network for Clinical Effectiveness and Research Translation.

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb 1;187(3):320-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201206-0994WS. Epub 2012 Nov 15.

8.

Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts.

Camden C, Shikako-Thomas K, Nguyen T, Graham E, Thomas A, Sprung J, Morris C, Russell DJ.

Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(15):1390-400. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2014.963705. Epub 2014 Sep 22. Review.

PMID:
25243763
9.

Stakeholder involvement: how to do it right: article 9 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.

Cluzeau F, Wedzicha JA, Kelson M, Corn J, Kunz R, Walsh J, Schünemann HJ; ATS/ERS Ad Hoc Committee on Integrating and Coordinating Efforts in COPD Guideline Development.

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):269-73. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-062ST. Review.

PMID:
23256170
10.

A systematic review of approaches for engaging patients for research on rare diseases.

Forsythe LP, Szydlowski V, Murad MH, Ip S, Wang Z, Elraiyah TA, Fleurence R, Hickam DH.

J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Aug;29 Suppl 3:S788-800. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-2895-9. Review.

11.

The Refinement of Topics for Systematic Reviews: Lessons and Recommendations From the Effective Health Care Program [Internet].

Buckley DI, Ansari M, Butler M, Williams C, Chang C.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Jan.

12.

Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies.

Viswanathan M, Nerz P, Dalberth B, Voisin C, Lohr KN, Tant E, Jonas DE, Carey T.

J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Jul;1(4):329-46. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.28. Review.

PMID:
24237467
13.

Integrating values and consumer involvement in guidelines with the patient at the center: article 8 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.

Kelson M, Akl EA, Bastian H, Cluzeau F, Curtis JR, Guyatt G, Montori VM, Oliver S, Schünemann HJ; ATS/ERS Ad Hoc Committee on Integrating and Coordinating Efforts in COPD Guideline Development.

Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):262-8. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-061ST. Review.

PMID:
23256169
14.

Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice.

Esmail L, Moore E, Rein A.

J Comp Eff Res. 2015 Mar;4(2):133-45. doi: 10.2217/cer.14.79. Review.

15.

Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.

PMID:
14698953
16.

Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.

Chilcott J, Tappenden P, Rawdin A, Johnson M, Kaltenthaler E, Paisley S, Papaioannou D, Shippam A.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250. Review.

17.

Recent trends and developments in dialogue on radioactive waste management: experience from the UK.

Kemp RV, Bennett DG, White MJ.

Environ Int. 2006 Dec;32(8):1021-32. Epub 2006 Jul 17. Review.

PMID:
16844222
19.

Supplemental Content

Support Center