Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 17

1.

The cycle of bias in health research: a framework and toolbox for critical appraisal training.

Odierna DH, Forsyth SR, White J, Bero LA.

Account Res. 2013;20(2):127-41. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2013.768931.

2.

The effectiveness of tools used to evaluate successful critical decision making skills for applicants to healthcare graduate educational programs: a systematic review.

Benham B, Hawley D.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 May 15;13(4):231-75. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2322. Review.

PMID:
26447081
3.

Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings.

Horsley T, Hyde C, Santesso N, Parkes J, Milne R, Stewart R.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;(11):CD001270. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001270.pub2. Review.

PMID:
22071800
4.

Microteaching and standardized students support faculty development for clinical teaching.

Gelula MH, Yudkowsky R.

Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):941. Review.

PMID:
12228115
5.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

6.

Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.

Marusic A, Wager E, Utrobicic A, Rothstein HR, Sambunjak D.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4:MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2. Review.

PMID:
27040721
7.

Teaching critical appraisal skills in health care settings.

Parkes J, Hyde C, Deeks J, Milne R.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD001270. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(11):CD001270.

PMID:
11686986
8.

Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.

Steinert Y, Naismith L, Mann K.

Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937. Review.

PMID:
22578043
9.

User and carer involvement in the training and education of health professionals: a review of the literature.

Repper J, Breeze J.

Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Mar;44(3):511-9. Epub 2006 Jul 13. Review.

PMID:
16842793
10.

Cultural competence education for health professionals.

Horvat L, Horey D, Romios P, Kis-Rigo J.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 May 5;(5):CD009405. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009405.pub2. Review.

PMID:
24793445
11.

The effectiveness of problem-based learning on development of nursing students' critical thinking: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kong LN, Qin B, Zhou YQ, Mou SY, Gao HM.

Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Mar;51(3):458-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 10. Review.

PMID:
23850065
12.

Conflicts of interest: research and clinical care.

Morris JC.

Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1994;8(Suppl. 4):49-57. Review.

PMID:
11657673
13.

Extent and impact of industry sponsorship conflicts of interest in dermatology research.

Perlis CS, Harwood M, Perlis RH.

J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005 Jun;52(6):967-71. Review.

PMID:
15928613
14.

Identifying and avoiding bias in research.

Pannucci CJ, Wilkins EG.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Aug;126(2):619-25. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181de24bc. Review.

15.

A review of conflict of interest, competing interest, and bias for toxicologists.

Claxton LD.

Toxicol Ind Health. 2007 Nov;23(10):557-71. Review.

PMID:
18717514
16.

Management of conflicts of interest in cardiovascular medicine.

Kirkpatrick JN, Kadakia MB, Vargas A.

Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Nov-Dec;55(3):258-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.006. Review.

PMID:
23217429
17.

Industry and evidence-based medicine: Believable or conflicted? A systematic review of the surgical literature.

Bailey CS, Fehlings MG, Rampersaud YR, Hall H, Wai EK, Fisher CG.

Can J Surg. 2011 Oct;54(5):321-6. doi: 10.1503/cjs.008610. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center