Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 15

1.

UN agrees new treaty to reduce harm from mercury.

Kirby T.

Lancet. 2013 Feb 2;381(9864):362. No abstract available.

PMID:
23383413
2.

Environmental policy, legislation and management of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) in China.

Lau MH, Leung KM, Wong SW, Wang H, Yan ZG.

Environ Pollut. 2012 Jun;165:182-92. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 30. Review.

PMID:
22285063
3.

Science and strategies to reduce mercury risks: a critical review.

Selin NE.

J Environ Monit. 2011 Sep;13(9):2389-99. doi: 10.1039/c1em10448a. Epub 2011 Jul 27. Review.

PMID:
21792430
4.

A real plan of action on mercury.

Bender MT, Williams JM.

Public Health Rep. 1999 Sep-Oct;114(5):416-20. Review. No abstract available.

5.

[Current problems and prospects raised by environmental pollution].

Zamfir G.

Sante Publique (Bucur). 1980;23(3):201-19. Review. French. No abstract available.

PMID:
7017973
6.

[European Economic Community and environmental protection (review of the literature)].

Lifliand LM.

Gig Sanit. 1990 Mar;(3):61-5. Review. Russian. No abstract available.

PMID:
2200742
7.

Ban on thimerosal in draft treaty on mercury: why the AAP's position in 2012 is so important.

Cooper LZ, Katz SL.

Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):152-3. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1823. Epub 2012 Dec 17. Review. No abstract available.

8.

The environmental effects of dental amalgam.

Chin G, Chong J, Kluczewska A, Lau A, Gorjy S, Tennant M.

Aust Dent J. 2000 Dec;45(4):246-9. Review.

9.

Environmental radiation protection: philosophy, monitoring and standards.

Janssens A.

J Environ Radioact. 2004;72(1-2):65-73. Review.

PMID:
15162857
10.

Mercury policy and regulations for coal-fired power plants.

Rallo M, Lopez-Anton MA, Contreras ML, Maroto-Valer MM.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2012 May;19(4):1084-96. doi: 10.1007/s11356-011-0658-2. Epub 2011 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
22090257
11.

Mercury in municipal solid waste in China and its control: a review.

Cheng H, Hu Y.

Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Jan 17;46(2):593-605. doi: 10.1021/es2026517. Epub 2011 Dec 21. Review.

PMID:
22136661
12.

Approaches to reducing mercury in North America.

Weiss J.

Ecotoxicology. 2005 Mar;14(1-2):15-7. Review.

PMID:
15931955
13.

Pesticide risk assessment and management in a globally changing world--report from a European interdisciplinary workshop.

Babut M, Arts GH, Barra Caracciolo A, Carluer N, Domange N, Friberg N, Gouy V, Grung M, Lagadic L, Martin-Laurent F, Mazzella N, Pesce S, Real B, Reichenberger S, Roex EW, Romijn K, Röttele M, Stenrød M, Tournebize J, Vernier F, Vindimian E.

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Nov;20(11):8298-312. doi: 10.1007/s11356-013-2004-3. Epub 2013 Aug 23. Review. No abstract available.

14.

Environmental policy in economies in transition.

Zylicz T.

Scand J Work Environ Health. 1999;25 Suppl 3:72-80. Review.

15.

[Problems of mercurialism in relation to mercury pollution of the environment].

Trakhtenberg IM, Korshun MN.

Gig Sanit. 1974 Aug;39(8):72-6. Review. Russian. No abstract available.

PMID:
4618226

Supplemental Content

Support Center