Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 70

2.

Evaluating the Potential Use of Modeling and Value-of-Information Analysis for Future Research Prioritization Within the Evidence-Based Practice Center Program [Internet].

Myers E, Sanders GD, Ravi D, Matchar D, Havrilesky L, Samsa G, Powers B, McBroom A, Musty M, Gray R.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun.

3.

Presentation of Future Research Needs [Internet].

Kane RL, Guise JM, Hartman K, Rothenberg B, Trikalinos T, Wilt T.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Apr.

4.

Frameworks for Determining Research Gaps During Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Robinson KA, Saldanha IJ, Mckoy NA.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun.

5.

Engaging Stakeholders To Identify and Prioritize Future Research Needs [Internet].

O’Haire C, McPheeters M, Nakamoto E, LaBrant L, Most C, Lee K, Graham E, Cottrell E, Guise JM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun.

6.

Developing and Selecting Topic Nominations for Systematic Reviews.

Eder M, Feightner A, Webber E, Guirguis-Blake J, Whitlock EP.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Nov 19.

7.

Systematizing the Use of Value of Information Analysis in Prioritizing Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Hoomans T, Seidenfeld J, Basu A, Meltzer D.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Aug.

8.

The Refinement of Topics for Systematic Reviews: Lessons and Recommendations From the Effective Health Care Program [Internet].

Buckley DI, Ansari M, Butler M, Williams C, Chang C.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Jan.

9.

Framework for Determining Research Gaps During Systematic Review: Evaluation [Internet].

Robinson KA, Akinyede O, Dutta T, Sawin VI, Li T, Spencer MR, Turkelson CM, Weston C.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Feb.

10.

Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update.

Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari M, McDonagh M, Balk E, Whitlock E, Reston J, Bass E, Butler M, Gartlehner G, Hartling L, Kane R, McPheeters M, Morgan L, Morton SC, Viswanathan M, Sista P, Chang S.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2013 Nov 18.

11.

Defining the Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement in Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Cottrell E, Whitlock E, Kato E, Uhl S, Belinson S, Chang C, Hoomans T, Meltzer D, Noorani H, Robinson K, Schoelles K, Motu'apuaka M, Anderson J, Paynter R, Guise JM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2014 Mar.

12.

Identifying, Selecting, and Refining Topics.

Whitlock EP, Lopez SA, Chang S, Helfand M, Eder M, Floyd N.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2009 Apr 27.

13.

Assessing the impact of systematic reviews on future research: two case studies.

Viswanathan M, Nerz P, Dalberth B, Voisin C, Lohr KN, Tant E, Jonas DE, Carey T.

J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Jul;1(4):329-46. doi: 10.2217/cer.12.28. Review.

PMID:
24237467
14.

Peer Review of Search Strategies [Internet].

Relevo R, Paynter R.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun.

15.

Framework for Considering Study Designs for Future Research Needs [Internet].

Carey TS, Sanders GD, Viswanathan M, Trikalinos TA, Kato E, Chang S.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Mar.

16.

Future Research Needs for the Integration of Mental Health/Substance Abuse and Primary Care: Identification of Future Research Needs from Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 173 [Internet].

Carey TS, Crotty KA, Morrissey JP, Jonas DE, Viswanathan M, Thaker S, Ellis AR, Woodell C, Wines C.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2010 Sep.

17.

Decision and Simulation Modeling in Systematic Reviews [Internet].

Kuntz K, Sainfort F, Butler M, Taylor B, Kulasingam S, Gregory S, Mann E, Anderson JM, Kane RL.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013 Feb.

18.

Future Research Needs for Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments of Localized Prostate Cancer: Identification of Future Research Needs from Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 13 [Internet].

Rothenberg BM, Marbella A, Belinson SE, Samson DJ, Bonnell CJ, Ziegler KM, Aronson N.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2010 Sep.

19.
20.

Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions.

Viswanathan M, Ansari MT, Berkman ND, Chang S, Hartling L, McPheeters M, Santaguida PL, Shamliyan T, Singh K, Tsertsvadze A, Treadwell JR.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2012 Mar 8.

Supplemental Content

Support Center