Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 15

1.

Reply: The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy.

Peled AW, Esserman LJ.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Feb;131(2):279e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318278d739. No abstract available.

PMID:
23358028
2.

Direct-to-implant breast reconstruction.

Salzberg CA.

Clin Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;39(2):119-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2012.01.001. Review.

PMID:
22482353
3.

The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.

Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Rosenkranz KM, Powell SG, Nigriny JF, Vidal DC.

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2014 Apr;67(4):468-76. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.12.035. Epub 2014 Jan 23. Review.

PMID:
24508194
4.

Advances in breast reconstruction of mastectomy and lumpectomy defects.

Ballard TN, Momoh AO.

Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2014 Jul;23(3):525-48. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2014.03.012. Epub 2014 Apr 26. Review.

PMID:
24882349
5.

Focus on technique: one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.

Salzberg CA.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5 Suppl 2):95S-103S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262e1a1. Review. Erratum in: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar;131(3):669.

PMID:
23096993
6.

A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Van Vliet MM, Powell SG, Rosen JM, Nigriny JF.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 May;131(5):953-61. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182865a24. Review.

PMID:
23629077
7.

Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction: a systematic and critical review of efficacy and associated morbidity.

Sbitany H, Serletti JM.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Dec;128(6):1162-9. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318230c29e. Review.

PMID:
22094735
8.

Issues related to choice of breast reconstruction in early-stage breast cancer.

O'Shaughnessy K, Fine N.

Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2006 Mar;7(2):129-39. Review.

PMID:
16455024
9.

Systematic review on the patient-reported outcomes of tissue-expander/implant vs autologous abdominal tissue breast reconstruction in postmastectomy breast cancer patients.

Tsoi B, Ziolkowski NI, Thoma A, Campbell K, O'Reilly D, Goeree R.

J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):1038-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.011. Epub 2014 Feb 19. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
24745568
10.

[Biological implant in single-stage reconstruction of mammary gland for cancer].

Zikiriakhodzhaev AD, Ermoshchenkova MV.

Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2015;(1):35-40. Review. Russian.

PMID:
25909549
11.

Breast reconstruction through tissue expansion.

Hinojosa RJ, Layman AS.

Plast Surg Nurs. 1996 Fall;16(3):139-45. Review.

PMID:
9060753
12.

Complications of acellular dermal matrices in breast surgery.

Israeli R.

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Nov;130(5 Suppl 2):159S-72S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182634e62. Review.

PMID:
23096966
13.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of complications associated with acellular dermal matrix-assisted breast reconstruction.

Ho G, Nguyen TJ, Shahabi A, Hwang BH, Chan LS, Wong AK.

Ann Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;68(4):346-56. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31823f3cd9. Review.

PMID:
22421476
14.

Do acellularized dermal matrices change the rationale for immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction?

Draper LB, Disa JJ.

Clin Plast Surg. 2012 Apr;39(2):113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2011.12.002. Epub 2012 Jan 21. Review.

PMID:
22482352
15.

Breast reconstruction following mastectomy.

Versaci AD, Libbey JT.

Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1994 Dec;21(4):733-50. Review.

PMID:
7731645

Supplemental Content

Support Center