Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 28

1.

Building a strategic framework for comparative effectiveness research in complementary and integrative medicine.

Witt CM, Chesney M, Gliklich R, Green L, Lewith G, Luce B, McCaffrey A, Rafferty Withers S, Sox HC, Tunis S, Berman BM.

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2012;2012:531096. doi: 10.1155/2012/531096. Epub 2012 Dec 26.

2.

Which research is needed to support clinical decision-making on integrative medicine?- Can comparative effectiveness research close the gap?

Witt CM, Huang WJ, Lao L, Bm B.

Chin J Integr Med. 2012 Oct;18(10):723-9. doi: 10.1007/s11655-012-1255-z. Epub 2012 Sep 11. Review.

PMID:
22965697
3.

International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Levy AR, Mitton C, Johnston KM, Harrigan B, Briggs AH.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000. Review.

PMID:
20831289
4.

An introduction to comparative effectiveness research.

Marko NF, Weil RJ.

Neurosurgery. 2012 Feb;70(2):425-34; discussion 434. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182320a9e. Review.

PMID:
21849923
5.

Comparative effectiveness research paradigm: implications for systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.

Brouwers MC, Thabane L, Moher D, Straus SE.

J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 1;30(34):4202-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.1644. Epub 2012 Oct 15. Review.

PMID:
23071227
6.

Consensus of recommendations guiding comparative effectiveness research methods.

Morton JB, McConeghy R, Heinrich K, Gatto NM, Caffrey AR.

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):1354-1360. doi: 10.1002/pds.4051. Epub 2016 Jun 30. Review.

PMID:
27365094
7.

Perioperative comparative effectiveness research.

Memtsoudis SG, Besculides MC.

Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;25(4):535-47. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2011.08.004. Review.

PMID:
22099919
8.

The role of comparative effectiveness research in transfusion medicine clinical trials: proceedings of a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop.

Blajchman MA, Carson JL, Eikelboom JW, Heddle NM, Lacroix J, Lauer MS, Platt R, Tilley B, Triulzi D, Vickers AJ, Yusuf S, Glynn S, Mondoro TH, Wagner E.

Transfusion. 2012 Jun;52(6):1363-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03640.x. Epub 2012 Apr 9.

PMID:
22486525
9.

The policy debate over public investment in comparative effectiveness research.

Rich EC.

J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Jun;24(6):752-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-0958-0. Epub 2009 Apr 21. Review.

10.

Comparative effectiveness research: Relevance and applications to pharmacy.

Schumock GT, Pickard AS.

Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Jul 15;66(14):1278-86. doi: 10.2146/ajhp090150. Review.

PMID:
19574602
11.

Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Shah BR, Drozda J, Peterson ED.

Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.012. Review.

PMID:
20598966
12.

Building the evidence base for decision making in cancer genomic medicine using comparative effectiveness research.

Goddard KA, Knaus WA, Whitlock E, Lyman GH, Feigelson HS, Schully SD, Ramsey S, Tunis S, Freedman AN, Khoury MJ, Veenstra DL.

Genet Med. 2012 Jul;14(7):633-42. Review.

13.

Effectiveness guidance document (EGD) for Chinese medicine trials: a consensus document.

Witt CM, Aickin M, Cherkin D, Che CT, Elder C, Flower A, Hammerschlag R, Liu JP, Lao L, Phurrough S, Ritenbaugh C, Rubin LH, Schnyer R, Wayne PM, Withers SR, Zhao-Xiang B, Young J, Berman BM; Collaborators.

Trials. 2014 May 13;15:169. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-169. Review.

14.

Effectiveness Guidance Document (EGD) for acupuncture research - a consensus document for conducting trials.

Witt CM, Aickin M, Baca T, Cherkin D, Haan MN, Hammerschlag R, Hao JJ, Kaplan GA, Lao L, McKay T, Pierce B, Riley D, Ritenbaugh C, Thorpe K, Tunis S, Weissberg J, Berman BM; Effectiveness Guidance Documents Collaborators.

BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012 Sep 6;12:148. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-148.

15.
16.

Clinical guidelines and payer policies on fusion for the treatment of chronic low back pain.

Cheng JS, Lee MJ, Massicotte E, Ashman B, Gruenberg M, Pilcher LE, Skelly AC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S144-63. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef5b4. Review.

PMID:
21952186
17.

Data for cancer comparative effectiveness research: past, present, and future potential.

Meyer AM, Carpenter WR, Abernethy AP, Stürmer T, Kosorok MR.

Cancer. 2012 Nov 1;118(21):5186-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27552. Epub 2012 Apr 19. Review.

18.

Comparative effectiveness research in urology.

Wang AT, Wang JK, Montori VM, Murad MH.

World J Urol. 2011 Jun;29(3):277-82. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0637-0. Epub 2010 Dec 28. Review.

PMID:
21188385
19.

Evaluating methodological assumptions in comparative effectiveness research: overcoming pitfalls.

Alemayehu D, Cappelleri JC.

J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jan;3(1):79-93. doi: 10.2217/cer.13.84. Review.

PMID:
24345258
20.

Evaluating the economics of complementary and integrative medicine.

Herman PM.

Glob Adv Health Med. 2013 Mar;2(2):56-63. doi: 10.7453/gahmj.2013.002. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center