Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 7

1.

Tension between quality measurement, public quality reporting, and pay for performance.

Farmer SA, Black B, Bonow RO.

JAMA. 2013 Jan 23;309(4):349-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.191276. No abstract available.

PMID:
23340634
2.

Closing the quality gap: revisiting the state of the science (vol. 5: public reporting as a quality improvement strategy).

Totten AM, Wagner J, Tiwari A, O'Haire C, Griffin J, Walker M.

Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2012 Jul;(208.5):1-645. Review.

3.

Hospital cardiovascular outcome measures in federal pay-for-reporting and pay-for-performance programs: a brief overview of current efforts.

Spivack SB, Bernheim SM, Forman HP, Drye EE, Krumholz HM.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Sep;7(5):627-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001364. Review. No abstract available.

4.

The current state of nursing performance measurement, public reporting, and value-based purchasing.

Kurtzman ET, Dawson EM, Johnson JE.

Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2008 Aug;9(3):181-91. doi: 10.1177/1527154408323042. Review.

PMID:
18829604
5.

Reforming cardiovascular care: quality measurement and improvement, and pay-for-performance.

Dennison CR, Hughes S.

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Sep-Oct;24(5):341-3. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b4346e. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
19707095
6.

Pay-for-performance: toxic to quality? Insights from behavioral economics.

Himmelstein DU, Ariely D, Woolhandler S.

Int J Health Serv. 2014;44(2):203-14. Review.

PMID:
24919299
7.

Quality measurement: who is measuring outcomes and what are patients being told?

Maurer WG, Hebert CJ.

Cleve Clin J Med. 2006 Mar;73 Suppl 1:S30-5. Review.

PMID:
16570545
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center