Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 8

1.

["Predatory publishers"].

Olsson H.

Lakartidningen. 2012 Nov 21-27;109(47):2136. Swedish. No abstract available.

PMID:
23330475
2.

Preserving the Integrity of Citations and References by All Stakeholders of Science Communication.

Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Voronov AA, Gerasimov AN, Kostyukova EI, Kitas GD.

J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Nov;30(11):1545-52. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.11.1545. Epub 2015 Oct 16. Review.

3.

[Fraud and misconduct in scientific publications].

Matías-Guiu J, García-Ramos R.

Neurologia. 2010 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-4. Review. Spanish.

4.

Open access publishing.

Rankin JA, Franklin SG.

Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Jul;10(7):1352. Review. No abstract available.

5.

Issues and rules for authors concerning authorship versus acknowledgements, dual publication, self plagiarism, and salami publishing.

Baggs JG.

Res Nurs Health. 2008 Aug;31(4):295-7. doi: 10.1002/nur.20280. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
18324682
6.

Publishing Ethics and Predatory Practices: A Dilemma for All Stakeholders of Science Communication.

Gasparyan AY, Yessirkepov M, Diyanova SN, Kitas GD.

J Korean Med Sci. 2015 Aug;30(8):1010-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.8.1010. Epub 2015 Jul 15. Review.

7.

Ethical and legal aspects of inappropriate (ghost) authorship.

Emeson U, Pugh DM, Scruth EA.

Clin Nurse Spec. 2015 May-Jun;29(3):131-3. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0000000000000120. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
25856027
8.

What I learned from predatory publishers.

Beall J.

Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017 Jun 15;27(2):273-278. doi: 10.11613/BM.2017.029. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center