Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 14

1.

Prospective peer review of regional percutaneous interventional procedures: a tool for quality control and revalidation.

Blows LH, Dixon GF, Behan MW, Allen R, Cohen AS, Dickinson K, Furniss S, Hatrick R, Hildick-Smith D, Holmberg S, Hyde JA, Kneale B, Lewis ME, Lloyd G, Patel NR, Pegge N, Signy M, Sulke AN, Trivedi U, Walker DM, de Belder AJ.

EuroIntervention. 2012 Dec 20;8(8):939-44. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I8A143.

2.

ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 Update of the Clinical Competence Statement on Coronary Artery Interventional Procedures: a Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Revise the 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures).

Writing Committee Members, Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, Brindiss RG, Brush JE Jr, Burke JA, Dehmers GJ, Deychak YA, Jneids H, Jolliss JG, Landzberg JS, Levine GN, McClurken JB, Messengers JC, Moussas ID, Muhlestein JB, Pomerantz RM, Sanborn TA, Sivaram CA, Whites CJ, Williamss ES; ACCF/AHA/ACP Task Force On Clinical Competence and Training Members, Halperin JL, Beckman JA, Bolger A, Byrne JG, Lester SJ, Merli GJ, Muhlestein JB, Pina IL, Wang A, Weitz HH.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Aug 1;82(2):E69-111. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24985. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
23653399
4.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease: the unresolved conundrum.

Epstein SE, Waksman R, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Panza JA.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Oct;6(10):993-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.003. Review.

5.

ACCF/AHA/SCAI 2013 update of the clinical competence statement on coronary artery interventional procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Revise the 2007 Clinical Competence Statement on Cardiac Interventional Procedures).

Harold JG, Bass TA, Bashore TM, Brindis RG, Brush JE Jr, Burke JA, Dehmer GJ, Deychak YA, Jneid H, Jollis JG, Landzberg JS, Levine GN, McClurken JB, Messenger JC, Moussa ID, Muhlestein JB, Pomerantz RM, Sanborn TA, Sivaram CA, White CJ, Williams ES.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jul 23;62(4):357-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 May 8. Review. No abstract available.

6.

Association between operator procedure volume and patient outcomes in percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Strom JB, Wimmer NJ, Wasfy JH, Kennedy K, Yeh RW.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014 Jul;7(4):560-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.000884. Epub 2014 Jun 17. Review.

7.

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.

Deb S, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT, Tsubota H, Hill S, Fremes SE.

JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718. Review.

PMID:
24240936
8.

Appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention: a review.

Summers MR, Patel MR.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Jul;15(7):379. doi: 10.1007/s11886-013-0379-x. Review.

PMID:
23793780
9.

Percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery disease: procedural strategies and technical considerations.

Lee MS, Stone GW, Park SJ, Teirstein P, Moses J, Colombo A, Kandzari DE.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Apr 1;79(5):812-22. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23042. Epub 2011 Jul 25. Review.

PMID:
21793172
10.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in the UK: recommendations for good practice 2015.

Banning AP, Baumbach A, Blackman D, Curzen N, Devadathan S, Fraser D, Ludman P, Norell M, Muir D, Nolan J, Redwood S; British Cardiovascular Intervention society.

Heart. 2015 May;101 Suppl 3:1-13. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307821. Review.

11.

The rationale for Heart Team decision-making for patients with stable, complex coronary artery disease.

Head SJ, Kaul S, Mack MJ, Serruys PW, Taggart DP, Holmes DR Jr, Leon MB, Marco J, Bogers AJ, Kappetein AP.

Eur Heart J. 2013 Aug;34(32):2510-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht059. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Review.

PMID:
23425523
12.

Percutaneous coronary intervention with or without on-site coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Simard T, Hibbert B, Pourdjabbar A, Ramirez FD, Wilson KR, Hawken S, O'Brien ER.

Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):197-204. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.035. Epub 2012 Jan 10. Review.

PMID:
22240768
13.

Prolonged effectiveness of coronary artery bypass surgery versus drug-eluting stents in diabetics with multi-vessel disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ariyaratne TV, Ademi Z, Yap CH, Billah B, Rosenfeldt F, Yan BP, Reid CM.

Int J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 20;176(2):346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.072. Epub 2014 Jul 6. Review.

PMID:
25127976
14.

Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Meta-analysis of six randomized controlled trials.

Fanari Z, Weiss SA, Zhang W, Sonnad SS, Weintraub WS.

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Jan 22. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center