Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 29

1.

The design of the acetabular component and size of the femoral head influence the risk of revision following 34 721 single-brand cemented hip replacements: a retrospective cohort study of medium-term data from a National Joint Registry.

Jameson SS, Baker PN, Mason J, Gregg PJ, Brewster N, Deehan DJ, Reed MR.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Dec;94(12):1611-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B12.30040.

PMID:
23188900
2.

Femoral head fractures: hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty?

Ullmark G.

Hip Int. 2014 Oct 2;24 Suppl 10:e12-4. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000167. Review.

PMID:
25329978
3.

Arthroplasty options in femoral-neck fracture: answers from the national registries.

Kannan A, Kancherla R, McMahon S, Hawdon G, Soral A, Malhotra R.

Int Orthop. 2012 Jan;36(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1354-z. Epub 2011 Sep 20. Review.

4.

Revision of metal-on-metal hip replacements and resurfacings for adverse reaction to metal debris: a systematic review of outcomes.

Matharu GS, Pynsent PB, Dunlop DJ.

Hip Int. 2014 Jul-Aug;24(4):311-20. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000140. Epub 2014 May 23. Review.

PMID:
24970319
5.

Femoral stem impaction grafting: extending the role of cement.

Gehrke T, Gebauer M, Kendoff D.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):92-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32762. Review.

PMID:
24187362
6.

The management of femoral bone stock in THA revision: indications and techniques.

Bianchi L, Galante C, Zagra L.

Hip Int. 2014 Oct 2;24 Suppl 10:S37-43. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000174. Review.

PMID:
24970033
7.

Catastrophic failure of a cemented, collarless, polished, tapered cobalt-chromium femoral stem used with impaction bone-grafting. A report of two cases.

Jazrawi LM, Della Valle CJ, Kummer FJ, Adler EM, Di Cesare PE.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jun;81(6):844-7. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
10391549
8.

Risk factors for revision of primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Prokopetz JJ, Losina E, Bliss RL, Wright J, Baron JA, Katz JN.

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Dec 15;13:251. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-251. Review.

9.

Perspectives in managing an implant recall: revision of 94 Durom Metasul acetabular components.

Ng VY, Arnott L, McShane MA.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Sep 7;93(17):e100(1-5). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01311. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
21915553
10.

[What's new in total hip replacement?].

Kowalczewski JB, Milecki M, Marczak D.

Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2005;70(6):401-5. Review. Polish.

PMID:
16875180
11.

Large diameter femoral heads: is bigger always better?

Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ.

Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):23-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34342. Review.

PMID:
25381403
12.

Clinically significant corrosion at the head-neck taper interface in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and case series.

Carli A, Politis A, Zukor D, Huk O, Antoniou J.

Hip Int. 2015 Jan-Feb;25(1):7-14. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000180. Epub 2014 Oct 27. Review.

PMID:
25362877
13.

Hip replacement: landmark surgery in modern medical history.

Mellon SJ, Liddle AD, Pandit H.

Maturitas. 2013 Jul;75(3):221-6. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.04.011. Epub 2013 May 18. Review.

PMID:
23693138
14.

Primary hip replacement prostheses and their evidence base: systematic review of literature.

Kynaston-Pearson F, Ashmore AM, Malak TT, Rombach I, Taylor A, Beard D, Arden NK, Price A, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, Carr AJ, Glyn-Jones S.

BMJ. 2013 Dec 19;347:f6956. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f6956. Review.

15.

[Anchoring principles in hip prosthesis implantation. II: Acetabulum components].

Breusch SJ, Aldinger PR, Thomsen M, Lukoschek M, Ewerbeck V.

Unfallchirurg. 2000 Dec;103(12):1017-31. Review. German.

PMID:
11148898
16.

Acetabular fractures: the role of total hip replacement.

Sierra RJ, Mabry TM, Sems SA, Berry DJ.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):11-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32897. Review.

PMID:
24187344
17.

Femoral taperosis: an accident waiting to happen?

Wassef AJ, Schmalzried TP.

Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11 Suppl A):3-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B11.32630. Review.

PMID:
24187342
18.

Quality of outcome data in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of registry data and worldwide non-registry studies from 5 decades.

Pabinger C, Bridgens A, Berghold A, Wurzer P, Boehler N, Labek G.

Hip Int. 2015 Sep-Oct;25(5):394-401. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000239. Epub 2015 Mar 20. Review.

PMID:
25837781
19.

The choice between hip prosthetic bearing surfaces in total hip replacement: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Marques EM, Humphriss R, Welton NJ, Higgins JP, Hollingworth W, Lopez-Lopez JA, Thom H, Hunt LP, Blom AW, Beswick AD.

Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 1;5:19. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0189-5. Review.

20.

Surface replacement solutions for the arthritic hip.

Goldberg VM.

Orthopedics. 2005 Sep;28(9):943-4. Review.

PMID:
16190062

Supplemental Content

Support Center