Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 19

1.

Digital breast tomosynthesis versus supplemental diagnostic mammographic views for evaluation of noncalcified breast lesions.

Zuley ML, Bandos AI, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Kelly AE, Catullo VJ, Rathfon GY, Lu AH, Gur D.

Radiology. 2013 Jan;266(1):89-95. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120552. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

PMID:
23143023
2.

Supplemental Screening for Breast Cancer in Women With Dense Breasts: A Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Service Task Force [Internet].

Melnikow J, Fenton JJ, Whitlock EP, Miglioretti DL, Weyrich MS, Thompson JH, Shah K.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan.

PMID:
26866210
Free Books & Documents
3.

Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: A subjective side-by-side review.

Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA, Sumkin JH, Zuley ML, Gur D.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Aug;195(2):W172-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3244. Review.

PMID:
20651178
4.

MR Imaging for Diagnosis of Malignancy in Mammographic Microcalcifications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bennani-Baiti B, Baltzer PA.

Radiology. 2017 Jun;283(3):692-701. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016161106. Epub 2016 Oct 27. Review.

PMID:
27788035
5.

Breast magnetic resonance imaging as a problem-solving modality in mammographic BI-RADS 3 lesions.

Dorrius MD, Pijnappel RM, Jansen-van der Weide MC, Oudkerk M.

Cancer Imaging. 2010 Oct 4;10 Spec no A:S54-8. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2010.9020. Review.

PMID:
20880790
6.

Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Indications and Clinical Applications.

Peppard HR, Nicholson BE, Rochman CM, Merchant JK, Mayo RC 3rd, Harvey JA.

Radiographics. 2015 Jul-Aug;35(4):975-90. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140204. Epub 2015 May 29. Review.

PMID:
26024062
7.

Tomosynthesis-detected Architectural Distortion: Management Algorithm with Radiologic-Pathologic Correlation.

Durand MA, Wang S, Hooley RJ, Raghu M, Philpotts LE.

Radiographics. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):311-21. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150093. Review.

PMID:
26963448
8.

[Malignancy in ACR 3 category mammographic lesions, masses and calcifications].

Travade A, Isnard A, Bagard C, Bouchet F.

J Radiol. 2004 Dec;85(12 Pt 2):2111-22. Review. French.

PMID:
15692428
9.

Developing Asymmetries at Mammography: A Multimodality Approach to Assessment and Management.

Chesebro AL, Winkler NS, Birdwell RL, Giess CS.

Radiographics. 2016 Mar-Apr;36(2):322-34. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150123. Review.

PMID:
26963449
10.

Digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) screening: A pictorial review of screen-detected cancers and false recalls attributed to tomosynthesis in prospective screening trials.

Houssami N, Lång K, Bernardi D, Tagliafico A, Zackrisson S, Skaane P.

Breast. 2016 Apr;26:119-34. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.01.007. Epub 2016 Feb 18. Review.

PMID:
27017251
11.

Abnormal mammographic findings with short-interval follow-up recommendation.

Chlebowski RT, Khalkhali I.

Clin Breast Cancer. 2005 Aug;6(3):235-9. Review.

PMID:
16137434
12.

Breast MR Imaging for Equivocal Mammographic Findings: Help or Hindrance?

Giess CS, Chikarmane SA, Sippo DA, Birdwell RL.

Radiographics. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):943-56. doi: 10.1148/rg.2016150205. Epub 2016 Jun 10. Review.

PMID:
27284757
13.

[Explorations of breast microcalcifications: Guidelines].

Chamming's F, Chopier J, Mathelin C, Chéreau E.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Dec;44(10):960-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.038. Epub 2015 Oct 31. Review. French.

PMID:
26527023
14.

Focal asymmetric densities seen at mammography: US and pathologic correlation.

Samardar P, de Paredes ES, Grimes MM, Wilson JD.

Radiographics. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):19-33. Review.

PMID:
11796895
15.

Breast tomosynthesis: present considerations and future applications.

Park JM, Franken EA Jr, Garg M, Fajardo LL, Niklason LT.

Radiographics. 2007 Oct;27 Suppl 1:S231-40. doi: 10.1148/rg.27si075511. Review.

PMID:
18180229
16.

Imaging of breast masses.

Bassett LW.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2000 Jul;38(4):669-91, vii-viii. Review.

PMID:
10943270
17.

[Breast imaging of mass, architectural distortion and asymmetry: Clinical practice guidelines].

Chopier J, Roedlich MN, Mathelin C.

J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2015 Dec;44(10):947-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.09.056. Epub 2015 Nov 2. Review. French.

PMID:
26541564
18.

Evolution of Imaging in Breast Cancer.

Garcia EM, Crowley J, Hagan C, Atkinson LL.

Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jun;59(2):322-35. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000193. Review.

PMID:
27029017
19.

The normal breast and its variations in mammography.

Stines J, Tristant H.

Eur J Radiol. 2005 Apr;54(1):26-36. Review.

PMID:
15797291

Supplemental Content

Support Center