Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 8

1.

Reply to letter to the editor: the withdrawn ASR™ THA and hip resurfacing systems: how have our patients fared over 1 to 6 years?

Hug KT, Watters TS, Vail TP, Bolognesi MP.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jan;471(1):337. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2669-9. No abstract available.

2.

Why total hip resurfacing.

Schmalzried TP.

J Arthroplasty. 2007 Oct;22(7 Suppl 3):57-60. Review.

PMID:
17919595
3.

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.

Amanatullah DF, Cheung Y, Di Cesare PE.

Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.01.002. Review.

PMID:
20399365
4.

[Whether bone quality matters or not in durability of total hip arthroplasty? Bone quality matters in durability of total hip arthroplasty].

Kobayashi S.

Clin Calcium. 2011 May;21(5):746-50. doi: CliCa1105746750. Review. Japanese.

PMID:
21532126
5.

Cementless femoral components in young patients: review and meta-analysis of total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing.

Springer BD, Connelly SE, Odum SM, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, Mason JB, Masonis JL.

J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.032. Review.

PMID:
19556097
6.

Hip resurfacing-keys to success.

Maguire CM, Seyler TM, Boyd HS, Lai LP, Delanois RE, Jinnah RH.

Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis. 2009;67(2):142-5. Review.

8.

[Surgical approaches in hip resurfacing].

Gerdesmeyer L, Gollwitzer H, Bader R, Rudert M.

Orthopade. 2008 Jul;37(7):650-8. doi: 10.1007/s00132-008-1282-9. Review. German.

PMID:
18548229
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center