Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 7

1.

Trends and correlates of good perinatal outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.

Joshi N, Kissin D, Anderson JE, Session D, Macaluso M, Jamieson DJ.

Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Oct;120(4):843-51.

2.

Pregnancy and birth outcomes in couples with infertility with and without assisted reproductive technology: with an emphasis on US population-based studies.

Luke B.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Mar 18. pii: S0002-9378(17)30423-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.012. [Epub ahead of print] Review.

PMID:
28322775
3.

Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology 2004-2013.

Kushnir VA, Barad DH, Albertini DF, Darmon SK, Gleicher N.

Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 Jan 10;15(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0225-2. Review.

4.

Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pinborg A, Wennerholm UB, Romundstad LB, Loft A, Aittomaki K, Söderström-Anttila V, Nygren KG, Hazekamp J, Bergh C.

Hum Reprod Update. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):87-104. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dms044. Epub 2012 Nov 14. Review.

PMID:
23154145
5.

Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30;(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5. Review.

PMID:
27357126
6.

Effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Myers ER, McCrory DC, Mills AA, Price TM, Swamy GK, Tantibhedhyangkul J, Wu JM, Matchar DB.

Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2008 May;(167):1-195. Review.

7.

Live birth is the correct outcome for clinical trials evaluating therapy for the infertile couple.

Barnhart KT.

Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.026. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center