Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 12

1.

Early aggressive versus initially conservative treatment in elderly patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a randomized controlled trial.

Savonitto S, Cavallini C, Petronio AS, Murena E, Antonicelli R, Sacco A, Steffenino G, Bonechi F, Mossuti E, Manari A, Tolaro S, Toso A, Daniotti A, Piscione F, Morici N, Cesana BM, Jori MC, De Servi S; Italian Elderly ACS Trial Investigators.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep;5(9):906-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.06.008.

2.

Long-term outcome of a routine versus selective invasive strategy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Fox KA, Clayton TC, Damman P, Pocock SJ, de Winter RJ, Tijssen JG, Lagerqvist B, Wallentin L; FIR Collaboration.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Jun 1;55(22):2435-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.03.007. Epub 2010 Mar 30. Review.

3.

Early invasive compared with a selective invasive strategy in women with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a substudy of the OASIS 5 trial and a meta-analysis of previous randomized trials.

Swahn E, Alfredsson J, Afzal R, Budaj A, Chrolavicius S, Fox K, Jolly S, Mehta SR, de Winter R, Yusuf S.

Eur Heart J. 2012 Jan;33(1):51-60. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp009. Epub 2009 Feb 7. Review.

PMID:
19202154
4.

Timing of invasive strategy in NSTE-ACS patients and effect on clinical outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Milasinovic D, Milosevic A, Marinkovic J, Vukcevic V, Ristic A, Asanin M, Stankovic G.

Atherosclerosis. 2015 Jul;241(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2015.04.808. Epub 2015 Apr 30. Review.

PMID:
25966439
5.

Early versus delayed percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.

Rajpurohit N, Garg N, Garg R, Choudhary A, Fresen J, Boren S, Dellsperger KC, Webel R, Aggarwal K, Alpert MA.

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Feb;81(2):223-31. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24439. Epub 2012 May 24. Review. Erratum in: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jun 1;81(7):1255.

PMID:
22488783
6.

Timing of early angiography in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Jiang M, Mao JL, Pu J, He B.

J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Feb;26(2):47-54. Review.

7.

Routine invasive versus conservative management strategies in acute coronary syndrome: time for a "hybrid" approach.

Pratap P, Gupta S, Berlowitz M.

J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Feb;5(1):30-40. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9333-8. Epub 2011 Dec 13. Review. Erratum in: J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Aug;5(4):553. Berlowtiz, Michael [corrected to Berlowitz, Michael].

PMID:
22161254
8.

Multivessel versus Single Vessel Angioplasty in Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis.

Mariani J, Macchia A, De Abreu M, Gonzalez Villa Monte G, Tajer C.

PLoS One. 2016 Feb 17;11(2):e0148756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148756. eCollection 2016. Review.

9.

Optimal timing of coronary invasive strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Navarese EP, Gurbel PA, Andreotti F, Tantry U, Jeong YH, Kozinski M, Engstrøm T, Di Pasquale G, Kochman W, Ardissino D, Kedhi E, Stone GW, Kubica J.

Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 19;158(4):261-270. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-4-201302190-00006. Review.

PMID:
23420234
10.

Routine invasive versus conservative management in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Sinnaeve PR.

J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2012 Feb;5(1):22-9. doi: 10.1007/s12265-011-9328-5. Epub 2011 Nov 1. Review.

PMID:
22042637
11.

Indications, algorithms, and outcomes for coronary artery bypass surgery in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Yerokun BA, Williams JB, Gaca J, Smith PK, Roe MT.

Coron Artery Dis. 2016 Jun;27(4):319-26. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000364. Review.

12.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients: is it beneficial?

Shanmugasundaram M.

Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(4):398-403. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center