Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 63

1.

Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography.

Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, Berman DS, Koo BK, van Mieghem C, Erglis A, Lin FY, Dunning AM, Apruzzese P, Budoff MJ, Cole JH, Jaffer FA, Leon MB, Malpeso J, Mancini GB, Park SJ, Schwartz RS, Shaw LJ, Mauri L.

JAMA. 2012 Sep 26;308(12):1237-45.

2.
3.

Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: A Review and Critical Analysis.

Hecht HS, Narula J, Fearon WF.

Circ Res. 2016 Jul 8;119(2):300-16. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307914. Review.

4.

Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Deng SB, Jing XD, Wang J, Huang C, Xia S, Du JL, Liu YJ, She Q.

Int J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 1;184:703-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.025. Epub 2015 Mar 4. Review.

PMID:
25781722
5.

Modeling of fractional flow reserve based on coronary CT angiography.

Grunau GL, Min JK, Leipsic J.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2013 Jan;15(1):336. doi: 10.1007/s11886-012-0336-0. Review.

PMID:
23264169
6.

Diagnostic accuracy of static CT perfusion for the detection of myocardial ischemia. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sørgaard MH, Kofoed KF, Linde JJ, George RT, Rochitte CE, Feuchtner G, Lima JA, Abdulla J.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Nov - Dec;10(6):450-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.09.003. Epub 2016 Oct 15. Review.

PMID:
27773634
7.

Computed fractional flow reserve (FFTCT) derived from coronary CT angiography.

Zarins CK, Taylor CA, Min JK.

J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2013 Oct;6(5):708-14. doi: 10.1007/s12265-013-9498-4. Epub 2013 Aug 10. Review.

8.

Diagnostic performance of cardiac imaging methods to diagnose ischaemia-causing coronary artery disease when directly compared with fractional flow reserve as a reference standard: a meta-analysis.

Danad I, Szymonifka J, Twisk JWR, Norgaard BL, Zarins CK, Knaapen P, Min JK.

Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 1;38(13):991-998. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw095. Review.

9.

Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis.

Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK.

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 4;61(22):2233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.083. Epub 2013 Apr 3. Review.

10.

Beyond Stenosis With Fractional Flow Reserve Via Computed Tomography and Advanced Plaque Analyses for the Diagnosis of Lesion-Specific Ischemia.

Cheruvu C, Naoum C, Blanke P, Norgaard B, Leipsic J.

Can J Cardiol. 2016 Nov;32(11):1315.e1-1315.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.01.023. Epub 2016 Jan 29. Review.

PMID:
27032888
11.

Physiologic evaluation of ischemia using cardiac CT: current status of CT myocardial perfusion and CT fractional flow reserve.

Choi AD, Joly JM, Chen MY, Weigold WG.

J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014 Jul-Aug;8(4):272-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 17. Review.

PMID:
25151919
12.

Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve in the assessment of coronary artery stenoses.

Kakouros N, Rybicki FJ, Mitsouras D, Miller JM.

Eur Radiol. 2013 Apr;23(4):958-67. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2670-4. Epub 2012 Nov 24. Review.

PMID:
23179519
13.

CFR and FFR assessment with PET and CTA: strengths and limitations.

Nakazato R, Heo R, Leipsic J, Min JK.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014 May;16(5):484. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0484-5. Review.

14.

Fractional flow reserve modeled from resting coronary CT angiography: state of the science.

Precious B, Blanke P, Nørgaard BL, Min JK, Leipsic J.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):W243-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13637. Review.

PMID:
25714308
15.

Determining the haemodynamic significance of arterial stenosis: the relationship between CT angiography, computational fluid dynamics, and non-invasive fractional flow reserve.

Pang CL, Alcock R, Pilkington N, Reis T, Roobottom C.

Clin Radiol. 2016 Aug;71(8):750-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 6. Review.

PMID:
27061041
16.

Noninvasive FFR derived from coronary CT angiography in the management of coronary artery disease: technology and clinical update.

Nakanishi R, Budoff MJ.

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2016 Jun 22;12:269-78. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S79632. eCollection 2016. Review.

17.

[Computed tomography in patients with chronic stable angina : Fractional flow reserve measurement].

Renker M, Schoepf UJ, Becher T, Krampulz N, Kim W, Rolf A, Möllmann H, Hamm CW, Henzler T, Borggrefe M, Akin I, Baumann S.

Herz. 2017 Feb;42(1):51-57. doi: 10.1007/s00059-016-4433-5. Epub 2016 Jun 2. Review. German.

PMID:
27255115
18.

Fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography in stable coronary disease: a new standard in non-invasive testing?

Nørgaard BL, Jensen JM, Leipsic J.

Eur Radiol. 2015 Aug;25(8):2282-90. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3619-1. Epub 2015 Feb 14. Review.

PMID:
25680721
19.

Non-invasive functional assessment using computed tomography: when will they be ready for clinical use?

Yoon YE, Koo BK.

Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012 Jun;2(2):106-12. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2012.04.02. Review.

20.

Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Clinical Data and Scientific Principles.

Min JK, Taylor CA, Achenbach S, Koo BK, Leipsic J, Nørgaard BL, Pijls NJ, De Bruyne B.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Oct;8(10):1209-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.006. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center