Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 14

  • Showing results for a modified search because your search retrieved no results.
1.

Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research.

Lee CI, Bassett LW, Lehman CD.

Radiology. 2012 Sep;264(3):632-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120184. No abstract available.

PMID:
22919037
2.

Screening mammography in women 40 to 49 years of age.

Lisby MD.

Am Fam Physician. 2004 Nov 1;70(9):1750-2. Review. No abstract available.

3.

[Mammography screening in Germany].

Diekmann S, Diekmann F.

Radiologe. 2008 Jan;48(1):17-25. Review. German.

PMID:
18030441
4.

Dense breasts: a review of reporting legislation and available supplemental screening options.

Ho JM, Jafferjee N, Covarrubias GM, Ghesani M, Handler B.

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):449-56. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.11969. Review.

PMID:
25055284
5.

Screening mammography in primary care settings: implications for cost, access, and quality: background paper.

Wagner J.

Cancer Invest. 1993;11(6):699-705. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
8221203
6.

The use of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer screening.

Lee CH, Weinreb JC.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Mar;1(3):176-82. Review.

PMID:
17411555
7.

Auditing and benchmarks in screening and diagnostic mammography.

Feig SA.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;45(5):791-800, vi. Review.

PMID:
17888769
8.

[Screening for breast cancer: the time of decision].

Gordenne W.

J Belge Radiol. 1998 Apr;81(2):92-5. Review. French.

PMID:
9640877
9.

Medicolegal aspects of breast imaging.

Brenner RJ.

Radiol Clin North Am. 1992 Jan;30(1):277-86. Review.

PMID:
1732934
10.

Low-cost mass screening as a means of reducing overall mortality from breast cancer.

McLelland R.

Recent Results Cancer Res. 1990;119:53-9. Review.

PMID:
2236862
11.

Breast cancer screening. Interpreting new data for clinical practice.

Daly L.

Physician Assist. 1994 Oct;18(10):47-51, 56, 61-6. Review.

PMID:
10138304
12.

Mammography utilization, public health impact, and cost-effectiveness in the United States.

White E, Urban N, Taylor V.

Annu Rev Public Health. 1993;14:605-33. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
8323604
13.

Breast imaging flow models.

Parikh JR.

J Am Coll Radiol. 2004 Apr;1(4):265-9. Review.

PMID:
17411578
14.

The probably benign assessment.

Leung JW, Sickles EA.

Radiol Clin North Am. 2007 Sep;45(5):773-89, vi. Review.

PMID:
17888768

Supplemental Content

Support Center