Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 15

1.

Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

O'Horo JC, Jones A, Sternke M, Harper C, Safdar N.

Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Jul;87(7):643-51. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.02.024. Review.

2.

Accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review.

Lloyd A, Pasupuleti V, Thota P, Pant C, Rolston DD, Hernandez AV, Benites-Zapata VA, Fraser TG, Donskey CJ, Deshpande A.

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 May;82(1):4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Feb 23. Review.

PMID:
25752201
3.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Tenover FC, Baron EJ, Peterson LR, Persing DH.

J Mol Diagn. 2011 Nov;13(6):573-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Aug 18. Review.

4.

Diagnostic accuracy of loop-mediated isothermal amplification in detection of Clostridium difficile in stool samples: a meta-analysis.

Wei C, Wen-En L, Yang-Ming L, Shan L, Yi-Ming Z.

Arch Med Sci. 2015 Oct 12;11(5):927-36. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.54846. Review.

5.

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID): data review and recommendations for diagnosing Clostridium difficile-infection (CDI).

Crobach MJ, Dekkers OM, Wilcox MH, Kuijper EJ.

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009 Dec;15(12):1053-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03098.x. Review.

6.

Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: the molecular approach.

Eckert C, Jones G, Barbut F.

Future Microbiol. 2013 Dec;8(12):1587-98. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.129. Review.

PMID:
24266358
7.

Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review.

Bagdasarian N, Rao K, Malani PN.

JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):398-408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103. Review.

PMID:
25626036
8.

[Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection].

Le Guern R, Wallet F.

Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2013 Jul-Aug;71(4):395-400. doi: 10.1684/abc.2013.0861. Review. French.

9.

Clostridium difficile testing algorithms: what is practical and feasible?

Schmidt ML, Gilligan PH.

Anaerobe. 2009 Dec;15(6):270-3. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2009.10.005. Epub 2009 Oct 22. Review.

PMID:
19853666
10.

Diagnostic pitfalls in Clostridium difficile infection.

Planche T, Wilcox MH.

Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2015 Mar;29(1):63-82. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2014.11.008. Epub 2015 Jan 13. Review.

PMID:
25595842
11.

Prediction tools for unfavourable outcomes in Clostridium difficile infection: a systematic review.

Abou Chakra CN, Pepin J, Valiquette L.

PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30258. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030258. Epub 2012 Jan 24. Review.

12.

Molecular tools for diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis: systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.

de Ruiter CM, van der Veer C, Leeflang MM, Deborggraeve S, Lucas C, Adams ER.

J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Sep;52(9):3147-55. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00372-14. Epub 2014 May 14. Review.

13.

Accuracy of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction: systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Gomes CM, Mazin SC, Santos ER, Cesetti MV, B├Ąchtold GA, Cordeiro JH, Theodoro FC, Damasco Fdos S, Carranza SA, Santos Ade O, Roselino AM, Sampaio RN.

Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2015 Apr;110(2):157-65. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760140280. Epub 2015 Mar 31. Review.

14.

Clinical Significance of Molecular Diagnostic Tools for Bacterial Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review.

Rutanga JP, Nyirahabimana T.

Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis. 2016;2016:6412085. Epub 2016 Nov 16. Review.

15.

Polymerase chain reaction: A molecular diagnostic tool in periodontology.

Maheaswari R, Kshirsagar JT, Lavanya N.

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2016 Mar-Apr;20(2):128-35. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.176391. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center