Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 37

1.

Bivariate meta-analysis of predictive values of diagnostic tests can be an alternative to bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity.

Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Bossuyt PM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;65(10):1088-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

2.

An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.

Harbord RM, Whiting P, Sterne JA, Egger M, Deeks JJ, Shang A, Bachmann LM.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Nov;61(11):1095-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.09.013. Review.

PMID:
19208372
3.

Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Rutjes AW, Scholten RJ, Bossuyt PM, Zwinderman AH.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Oct;58(10):982-90. Review.

PMID:
16168343
4.
5.

An Empirical Assessment of Bivariate Methods for Meta-Analysis of Test Accuracy [Internet].

Dahabreh IJ, Trikalinos TA, Lau J, Schmid C.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Nov.

6.

Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people.

Cruciani M, Mengoli C, Loeffler J, Donnelly P, Barnes R, Jones BL, Klingspor L, Morton O, Maertens J.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 1;(10):CD009551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009551.pub3. Review.

PMID:
26424726
7.

Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people.

Cruciani M, Mengoli C, Loeffler J, Donnelly P, Barnes R, Jones BL, Klingspor L, Morton O, Maertens J.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 7;(9):CD009551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009551.pub2. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(10):CD009551.

PMID:
26343815
8.

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy.

Leeflang MM.

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Feb;20(2):105-13. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12474. Review.

9.

A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

Dinnes J, Deeks J, Kirby J, Roderick P.

Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(12):1-113, iii. Review.

10.

PET-CT for assessing mediastinal lymph node involvement in patients with suspected resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Schmidt-Hansen M, Baldwin DR, Hasler E, Zamora J, Abraira V, Roqué I Figuls M.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 13;(11):CD009519. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009519.pub2. Review.

PMID:
25393718
11.

Evaluating PET-CT in the detection and management of recurrent cervical cancer: systematic reviews of diagnostic accuracy and subjective elicitation.

Meads C, Davenport C, Małysiak S, Kowalska M, Zapalska A, Guest P, Martin-Hirsch P, Borowiack E, Auguste P, Barton P, Roberts T, Khan K, Sundar S.

BJOG. 2014 Mar;121(4):398-407. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12488. Epub 2013 Dec 3. Review.

12.

Pediatric thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: a meta-analysis.

Stevens C, Lee JK, Sadatsafavi M, Blair GK.

J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Nov;44(11):2184-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2009.07.022. Review.

PMID:
19944231
13.

The effects of clinical and statistical heterogeneity on the predictive values of results from meta-analyses.

Melsen WG, Bootsma MC, Rovers MM, Bonten MJ.

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Feb;20(2):123-9. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12494. Review.

14.

Diagnostic accuracy of first generation dual-source computed tomography in the assessment of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis from 24 studies.

Guo SL, Guo YM, Zhai YN, Ma B, Wang P, Yang KH.

Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Jul;27(6):755-71. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9690-4. Epub 2010 Sep 21. Review.

PMID:
20857200
15.

Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.

Best LM, Rawji V, Pereira SP, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 17;4:CD010213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010213.pub2. Review.

PMID:
28415140
16.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using the STRATIFY tool for prediction of falls in hospital patients: how well does it work?

Oliver D, Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Thabane L, Reizgys K, Foster G.

Age Ageing. 2008 Nov;37(6):621-7. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afn203. Epub 2008 Oct 1. Review.

17.

The predictive value of preoperative natriuretic peptide concentrations in adults undergoing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lurati Buse GA, Koller MT, Burkhart C, Seeberger MD, Filipovic M.

Anesth Analg. 2011 May;112(5):1019-33. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31820f286f. Epub 2011 Mar 3. Review.

PMID:
21372274
18.

CMR imaging assessing viability in patients with chronic ventricular dysfunction due to coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of prospective trials.

Romero J, Xue X, Gonzalez W, Garcia MJ.

JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 May;5(5):494-508. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.02.009. Review.

19.

Meta-epidemiologic analysis indicates that MEDLINE searches are sufficient for diagnostic test accuracy systematic reviews.

van Enst WA, Scholten RJ, Whiting P, Zwinderman AH, Hooft L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Nov;67(11):1192-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.05.008. Epub 2014 Jul 2. Review.

PMID:
24996667
20.

Noninvasive Diagnostic Tests for Breast Abnormalities: Update of a 2006 Review [Internet].

Bruening W, Uhl S, Fontanarosa J, Reston J, Treadwell J, Schoelles K.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Feb.

Supplemental Content

Support Center