Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 24

1.

A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data.

Sittig DF, Hazlehurst BL, Brown J, Murphy S, Rosenman M, Tarczy-Hornoch P, Wilcox AB.

Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S49-59. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259c02b.

2.

Building the informatics infrastructure for comparative effectiveness research (CER): a review of the literature.

Lopez MH, Holve E, Sarkar IN, Segal C.

Med Care. 2012 Jul;50 Suppl:S38-48. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318259becd. Review.

PMID:
22692258
3.

Informatics in action: lessons learned in comparative effectiveness research.

Hirsch BR, Giffin RB, Esmail LC, Tunis SR, Abernethy AP, Murphy SB.

Cancer J. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):235-8. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0b013e31822c3944. Review.

PMID:
21799331
4.

Importance of health information technology, electronic health records, and continuously aggregating data to comparative effectiveness research and learning health care.

Miriovsky BJ, Shulman LN, Abernethy AP.

J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 1;30(34):4243-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8011. Epub 2012 Oct 15. Review.

PMID:
23071233
5.

Informatics: essential infrastructure for quality assessment and improvement in nursing.

Henry SB.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1995 May-Jun;2(3):169-82. Review.

6.

Electronic data capture for registries and clinical trials in orthopaedic surgery: open source versus commercial systems.

Shah J, Rajgor D, Pradhan S, McCready M, Zaveri A, Pietrobon R.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Oct;468(10):2664-71. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1469-3. Review.

7.

Comparative Effectiveness Research Through a Collaborative Electronic Reporting Consortium.

Fiks AG, Grundmeier RW, Steffes J, Adams WG, Kaelber DC, Pace WD, Wasserman RC; Comparative Effectiveness Research Through Collaborative Electronic Reporting (CER2) Consortium.

Pediatrics. 2015 Jul;136(1):e215-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0673. Epub 2015 Jun 22. Review.

8.

The landscape of comparative effectiveness research in rheumatology.

DeWitt EM, Brunner HI.

Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014 Jan;10(1):57-62. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.140. Epub 2013 Sep 24. Review.

PMID:
24061502
9.

Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.

Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Boswell MV, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E23-54. Review.

10.

International comparison of comparative effectiveness research in five jurisdictions: insights for the US.

Levy AR, Mitton C, Johnston KM, Harrigan B, Briggs AH.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(10):813-30. doi: 10.2165/11536150-000000000-00000. Review.

PMID:
20831289
11.

Comprehensive computerised primary care records are an essential component of any national health information strategy: report from an international consensus conference.

de Lusignan S, Teasdale S, Little D, Zapp J, Zuckerman A, Bates DW, Steele A.

Inform Prim Care. 2004;12(4):255-64. Review.

12.

Data for cancer comparative effectiveness research: past, present, and future potential.

Meyer AM, Carpenter WR, Abernethy AP, Stürmer T, Kosorok MR.

Cancer. 2012 Nov 1;118(21):5186-97. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27552. Epub 2012 Apr 19. Review.

13.

Confronting actual practice with practice guidelines in oncology.

Hoelzer S, Hundahl SA, Stewart A, Reiners C, Liu R, Schweiger R, Dudeck J.

Qual Assur. 1999 Jul-Sep;7(3):163-71. Review.

PMID:
11033742
14.

A consensus action agenda for achieving the national health information infrastructure.

Yasnoff WA, Humphreys BL, Overhage JM, Detmer DE, Brennan PF, Morris RW, Middleton B, Bates DW, Fanning JP.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Jul-Aug;11(4):332-8. Epub 2004 Jun 7. Review.

15.
16.

Leveraging observational registries to inform comparative effectiveness research.

Shah BR, Drozda J, Peterson ED.

Am Heart J. 2010 Jul;160(1):8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.012. Review.

PMID:
20598966
17.

Health informatics and oncology nursing.

Delaney C.

Semin Oncol Nurs. 2001 Feb;17(1):2-6. Review.

PMID:
11236361
18.

Comparative effectiveness research in urology.

Wang AT, Wang JK, Montori VM, Murad MH.

World J Urol. 2011 Jun;29(3):277-82. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0637-0. Epub 2010 Dec 28. Review.

PMID:
21188385
19.

Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part 2 - implications for interventional pain management.

Manchikanti L, Falco FJ, Boswell MV, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2010 Jan-Feb;13(1):E55-79. Review.

20.

Medical informatics. An emerging academic discipline and institutional priority.

Greenes RA, Shortliffe EH.

JAMA. 1990 Feb 23;263(8):1114-20. Review.

PMID:
2405204

Supplemental Content

Support Center