Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 38

1.

Chapter 11: challenges in and principles for conducting systematic reviews of genetic tests used as predictive indicators.

Jonas DE, Wilt TJ, Taylor BC, Wilkins TM, Matchar DB.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S83-93. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1898-z.

2.

Challenges in and Principles for Conducting Systematic Reviews of Genetic Tests Used as Predictive Indicators.

Jonas DE, Wilt TJ, Taylor BC, Wilkins TM, Matchar DB.

In: Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA, editors. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun. Chapter 11.

3.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

4.

Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.

Jardine C, Hrudey S, Shortreed J, Craig L, Krewski D, Furgal C, McColl S.

J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev. 2003 Nov-Dec;6(6):569-720. Review.

PMID:
14698953
5.

Methodology for the systematic reviews on an evidence-based approach for the management of chronic low back pain.

Norvell DC, Dettori JR, Fehlings MG, Fourney DR, Chapman JR.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 1;36(21 Suppl):S10-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31822ef8ee. Review.

PMID:
21952182
6.

Chapter 12: systematic review of prognostic tests.

Rector TS, Taylor BC, Wilt TJ.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S94-101. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1899-y. Review.

7.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

8.

Evidence-based interventional pain management: principles, problems, potential and applications.

Manchikanti L, Boswell MV, Giordano J.

Pain Physician. 2007 Mar;10(2):329-56. Review.

9.

Screening for chlamydial infection.

Nelson HD, Helfand M.

Am J Prev Med. 2001 Apr;20(3 Suppl):95-107. Review.

PMID:
11306238
10.

The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. Review.

11.

Addressing Challenges in Genetic Test Evaluation: Evaluation Frameworks and Assessment of Analytic Validity [Internet].

Sun F, Bruening W, Erinoff E, Schoelles KM.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 Jun.

12.

Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.

PMID:
15968029
13.

Challenges in systematic reviews that evaluate drug efficacy or effectiveness.

Santaguida PL, Helfand M, Raina P.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1066-72. Review.

PMID:
15968031
14.

Generalisability in economic evaluation studies in healthcare: a review and case studies.

Sculpher MJ, Pang FS, Manca A, Drummond MF, Golder S, Urdahl H, Davies LM, Eastwood A.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Dec;8(49):iii-iv, 1-192. Review.

15.

AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Chou R, Aronson N, Atkins D, Ismaila AS, Santaguida P, Smith DH, Whitlock E, Wilt TJ, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):502-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Sep 26. Review.

PMID:
18823754
16.

Types of clinical studies. Systematic reviews.

Varandas T, Carneiro AV.

Rev Port Cardiol. 2006 Feb;25(2):233-46. Review. English, Portuguese.

17.

Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.

Chou R.

Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):531-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00422_2.x. Review.

PMID:
18346061
18.

Systematic reviews of adverse effects: framework for a structured approach.

Loke YK, Price D, Herxheimer A; Cochrane Adverse Effects Methods Group.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Jul 5;7:32. Review.

19.

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of testing for cytochrome P450 polymorphisms in patients with schizophrenia treated with antipsychotics: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Fleeman N, McLeod C, Bagust A, Beale S, Boland A, Dundar Y, Jorgensen A, Payne K, Pirmohamed M, Pushpakom S, Walley T, de Warren-Penny P, Dickson R.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Jan;14(3):1-157, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta14030. Review.

20.

Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 5. Diagnostic accuracy studies.

Manchikanti L, Derby R, Wolfer L, Singh V, Datta S, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):517-40. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center