Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 25

1.

Chapter 10: deciding whether to complement a systematic review of medical tests with decision modeling.

Trikalinos TA, Kulasingam S, Lawrence WF.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S76-82. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2019-3.

2.

Deciding Whether To Complement a Systematic Review of Medical Tests With Decision Modeling.

Trikalinos TA, Kulasingam S, Lawrence WF.

In: Chang SM, Matchar DB, Smetana GW, Umscheid CA, editors. Methods Guide for Medical Test Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2012 Jun. Chapter 10.

3.

Challenges in systematic reviews of diagnostic technologies.

Tatsioni A, Zarin DA, Aronson N, Samson DJ, Flamm CR, Schmid C, Lau J.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1048-55. Review.

PMID:
15968029
4.

Chapter 12: systematic review of prognostic tests.

Rector TS, Taylor BC, Wilt TJ.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27 Suppl 1:S94-101. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1899-y. Review.

5.
6.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

7.

Adding decision models to systematic reviews: informing a framework for deciding when and how to do so.

Sainfort F, Kuntz KM, Gregory S, Butler M, Taylor BC, Kulasingam S, Kane RL.

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):133-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.009. Review.

8.

Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting.

Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Halligan S, Hopewell S, Cornelius V, Altman DG.

BMJ. 2006 Aug 26;333(7565):413. Epub 2006 Jul 18. Review.

9.

A series of systematic reviews to inform a decision analysis for sampling and treating infected diabetic foot ulcers.

Nelson EA, O'Meara S, Craig D, Iglesias C, Golder S, Dalton J, Claxton K, Bell-Syer SE, Jude E, Dowson C, Gadsby R, O'Hare P, Powell J.

Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(12):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-221. Review.

10.

Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations.

Horvath AR, Pewsner D.

Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Apr;342(1-2):23-39. Review.

PMID:
15026264
11.

Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests: a guide to methods and application.

Khan KS.

Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Feb;19(1):37-46. Review.

PMID:
15749064
12.

Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.

Song F, Parekh S, Hooper L, Loke YK, Ryder J, Sutton AJ, Hing C, Kwok CS, Pang C, Harvey I.

Health Technol Assess. 2010 Feb;14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. doi: 10.3310/hta14080. Review.

13.

Using evidence in pain practice: Part I: Assessing quality of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.

Chou R.

Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):518-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00422_1.x. Review.

PMID:
18346062
14.

[Mapping the scientific evidence for bedside care to unstable angina. A preliminary step to develop clinical guidelines. The name of the study group CAMBIE Change in the Medical services based on the clinical practice guidelines].

Calderón Sandubet E, Cotos Cancas R, Marín León I, Briones Pérez de la Blanca E, Pérez Cano B, Grilo Reina A.

Med Clin (Barc). 2000;114 Suppl 2:19-23. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
10916801
15.

Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.

Chou R.

Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):531-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00422_2.x. Review.

PMID:
18346061
16.

Linking the evidence: intermediate outcomes in medical test assessments.

Staub LP, Dyer S, Lord SJ, Simes RJ.

Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012 Jan;28(1):52-8. doi: 10.1017/S0266462311000717. Epub 2012 Jan 23. Review.

PMID:
22230006
17.

Evidence-based laboratory medicine - a guide for critical evaluation of in vitro laboratory testing.

Christenson RH; Committee on Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine of the International Federation for Clinical Chemistry Laboratory Medicine.

Ann Clin Biochem. 2007 Mar;44(Pt 2):111-30. Review.

PMID:
17362577
18.

Systematic reviews with individual patient data meta-analysis to evaluate diagnostic tests.

Khan KS, Bachmann LM, ter Riet G.

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003 Jun 10;108(2):121-5. Review.

PMID:
12781397
19.

Clinical tests for screening and diagnosis of cervical spine myelopathy: a systematic review.

Cook CE, Wilhelm M, Cook AE, Petrosino C, Isaacs R.

J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2011 Oct;34(8):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2011.08.008. Epub 2011 Sep 6. Review.

PMID:
21899892
20.

Using evaluations of diagnostic tests: understanding their limitations and making the most of available evidence.

Deeks JJ.

Ann Oncol. 1999 Jul;10(7):761-8. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
10470421

Supplemental Content

Support Center