Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 52

1.

Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk.

van Ravesteyn NT, Miglioretti DL, Stout NK, Lee SJ, Schechter CB, Buist DS, Huang H, Heijnsdijk EA, Trentham-Dietz A, Alagoz O, Near AM, Kerlikowske K, Nelson HD, Mandelblatt JS, de Koning HJ.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):609-17. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00002.

2.

Benefits and Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review.

Myers ER, Moorman P, Gierisch JM, Havrilesky LJ, Grimm LJ, Ghate S, Davidson B, Mongtomery RC, Crowley MJ, McCrory DC, Kendrick A, Sanders GD.

JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1615-34. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13183. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1406.

3.

Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

Nelson HD, Pappas M, Cantor A, Griffin J, Daeges M, Humphrey L.

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):256-67. doi: 10.7326/M15-0970. Review.

PMID:
26756737
4.

Screening mammography in women less than age 50 years.

Kerlikowske K.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;24(1):38-43. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32834da49a. Review.

PMID:
22037165
5.

Screening for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation [Internet].

Nelson HD, Cantor A, Humphrey L, Fu R, Pappas M, Daeges M, Griffin J.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2016 Jan.

6.

Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force..

Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17;151(10):727-37, W237-42. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-10-200911170-00009. Review.

7.

Screening mammography in older women: a review.

Walter LC, Schonberg MA.

JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1336-47. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.2834. Review.

8.

Benefits and harms of mammography screening.

Løberg M, Lousdal ML, Bretthauer M, Kalager M.

Breast Cancer Res. 2015 May 1;17:63. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0525-z. Review.

9.

Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Ringash J; Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care..

CMAJ. 2001 Feb 20;164(4):469-76. Review. Erratum in: CMAJ 2001 Mar 20;164(6):753.

10.

Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.

Nelson HD, Fu R, Cantor A, Pappas M, Daeges M, Humphrey L.

Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16;164(4):244-55. doi: 10.7326/M15-0969. Review.

PMID:
26756588
11.

Controversies in breast cancer screening for women aged 40-49 years.

Suzuki A, Ishida T, Ohuchi N.

Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jul;44(7):613-8. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyu054. Review.

PMID:
24821976
12.

The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Mandelblatt J, Saha S, Teutsch S, Hoerger T, Siu AL, Atkins D, Klein J, Helfand M; Cost Work Group of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force..

Ann Intern Med. 2003 Nov 18;139(10):835-42. Review.

PMID:
14623621
13.

Adjunct ultrasonography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk: a systematic review.

Gartlehner G, Thaler KJ, Chapman A, Kaminski A, Berzaczy D, Van Noord MG, Helbich TH.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2013 Jun;11(2):87-93. doi: 10.1111/1744-1609.12022. Review.

PMID:
23750571
14.

Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Mammography for Breast Cancer Screening: A Health Technology Assessment.

Health Quality Ontario..

Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016 Jul 1;16(15):1-71. Review.

15.

A systematic assessment of benefits and risks to guide breast cancer screening decisions.

Pace LE, Keating NL.

JAMA. 2014 Apr 2;311(13):1327-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.1398. Review.

PMID:
24691608
16.

Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Nelson HD, Zakher B, Cantor A, Fu R, Griffin J, O'Meara ES, Buist DS, Kerlikowske K, van Ravesteyn NT, Trentham-Dietz A, Mandelblatt JS, Miglioretti DL.

Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 1;156(9):635-48. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-9-201205010-00006. Review.

17.

Outcomes of modern screening mammography.

Kerlikowske K, Barclay J.

J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1997;(22):105-11. Review.

PMID:
9709285
18.

Screening for breast cancer.

Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW.

JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56. Review.

19.

Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level.

Onega T, Beaber EF, Sprague BL, Barlow WE, Haas JS, Tosteson AN, D Schnall M, Armstrong K, Schapira MM, Geller B, Weaver DL, Conant EF.

Cancer. 2014 Oct 1;120(19):2955-64. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28771. Review.

20.

Benefits and Harms of Screening Mammography by Comorbidity and Age: A Qualitative Synthesis of Observational Studies and Decision Analyses.

Braithwaite D, Walter LC, Izano M, Kerlikowske K.

J Gen Intern Med. 2016 May;31(5):561-72. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3580-3. Review.

PMID:
26831305

Supplemental Content

Support Center