Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 25

1.

A Scandinavian experience of register collaboration: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).

Havelin LI, Robertsson O, Fenstad AM, Overgaard S, Garellick G, Furnes O.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93 Suppl 3:13-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00951.

PMID:
22262418
2.

[Endoprosthesis surgery of hip and knee, spare parts improve mobility].

Lehto MU, Jämsen E, Rissanen P.

Duodecim. 2005;121(8):893-901. Review. Finnish. No abstract available.

PMID:
15931836
3.

Hemiarthroplasties after hip fractures in Norway and Sweden: a collaboration between the Norwegian and Swedish national registries.

Gjertsen JE, Fenstad AM, Leonardsson O, Engesæter LB, Kärrholm J, Furnes O, Garellick G, Rogmark C.

Hip Int. 2014 May-Jun;24(3):223-30. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000105. Epub 2014 Feb 3. Review.

4.

Comparative pooled survival and revision rate of Austin-Moore hip arthroplasty in published literature and arthroplasty register data.

Sadoghi P, Thaler M, Janda W, Hübl M, Leithner A, Labek G.

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Mar 24. Review.

PMID:
23535284
5.

Validity of published outcome data concerning Anatomic Graduated Component total knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty register data.

Schuh R, Dorninger G, Agreiter M, Boehler N, Labek G.

Int Orthop. 2012 Jan;36(1):51-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-011-1255-1. Epub 2011 Apr 13. Review.

6.

Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis Overestimates the Risk of Revision Arthroplasty: A Meta-analysis.

Lacny S, Wilson T, Clement F, Roberts DJ, Faris PD, Ghali WA, Marshall DA.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3431-42. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4235-8. Review.

7.

Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers.

Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Böhler N, Labek G.

J Arthroplasty. 2013 Sep;28(8):1329-32. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.012. Epub 2013 Apr 18. Review.

PMID:
23602418
8.

Revision rates after total joint replacement: cumulative results from worldwide joint register datasets.

Labek G, Thaler M, Janda W, Agreiter M, Stöckl B.

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Mar;93(3):293-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25467. Review. Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Jul;93(7):998.

PMID:
21357948
9.

Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty.

Hanssen AD, Rand JA.

Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:111-22. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
10098033
10.

Assessing the comparability of hip arthroplasty registries in order to improve the recording and monitoring of outcome.

Lacny S, Bohm E, Hawker G, Powell J, Marshall DA.

Bone Joint J. 2016 Apr;98-B(4):442-51. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B4.36501. Review.

PMID:
27037425
11.

Revision rates after knee replacement. Cumulative results from worldwide clinical studies versus joint registers.

Pabinger C, Berghold A, Boehler N, Labek G.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013 Feb;21(2):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.11.014. Epub 2012 Dec 6. Review.

12.

The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty.

Gilg MM, Zeller CW, Leitner L, Leithner A, Labek G, Sadoghi P.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Oct;24(10):3272-3279. Epub 2016 May 6. Review.

PMID:
27154281
13.

[Ipsilateral THA after stemmed TKA: Risk of interprosthetic fracture?].

Dexel J, Hartmann A, Pyrc J, Günther KP, Lützner J.

Orthopade. 2015 Jul;44(7):489-96. doi: 10.1007/s00132-015-3096-x. Review. German.

PMID:
25860118
14.

Meta-analyses in joint arthroplasty: a review of quantity, quality, and impact.

Sharma R, Vannabouathong C, Bains S, Marshall A, MacDonald SJ, Parvizi J, Bhandari M.

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 21;93(24):2304-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01289. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
22258777
15.

Re-infection outcomes following one- and two-stage surgical revision of infected hip prosthesis in unselected patients: protocol for a systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Kunutsor SK, Whitehouse MR, Webb J, Toms A, Stockley I, Taylor A, Jones S, Wilson M, Burston B, Board T, Whittaker JP, Blom AW, Beswick AD.

Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 25;4:58. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0044-0. Review.

16.

Scientific production and impact of national registers: the example of orthopaedic national registers.

Boyer P, Boutron I, Ravaud P.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jul;19(7):858-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Mar 15. Review.

17.

Cancer incidence and causes of death among total hip replacement patients: a review based on Nordic cohorts with a special emphasis on metal-on-metal bearings.

Visuri TI, Pukkala E, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2006 Feb;220(2):399-407. Review.

PMID:
16669405
18.

Nordic registry-based cohort studies: Possibilities and pitfalls when combining Nordic registry data.

Maret-Ouda J, Tao W, Wahlin K, Lagergren J.

Scand J Public Health. 2017 Jul;45(17_suppl):14-19. doi: 10.1177/1403494817702336. Review.

PMID:
28683665
19.

Adherence of hip and knee arthroplasty studies to RSA standardization guidelines. A systematic review.

Madanat R, Mäkinen TJ, Aro HT, Bragdon C, Malchau H.

Acta Orthop. 2014 Sep;85(5):447-55. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.934187. Epub 2014 Jun 23. Review.

20.

Nordic Medical Birth Registers in epidemiological research.

Gissler M, Louhiala P, Hemminki E.

Eur J Epidemiol. 1997 Feb;13(2):169-75. Review.

PMID:
9085000

Supplemental Content

Support Center