Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 16


Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.

Dinh TA, Alperin P, Walter LC, Smith R.

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):730-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1972-6. Epub 2012 Jan 12. Review.


An international review of the main cost-effectiveness drivers of virtual colonography versus conventional colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: is the tide changing due to adherence?

Kriza C, Emmert M, Wahlster P, Niederländer C, Kolominsky-Rabas P.

Eur J Radiol. 2013 Nov;82(11):e629-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.07.019. Epub 2013 Aug 12. Review.


A systematic review and economic evaluation of diagnostic strategies for Lynch syndrome.

Snowsill T, Huxley N, Hoyle M, Jones-Hughes T, Coelho H, Cooper C, Frayling I, Hyde C.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep;18(58):1-406. doi: 10.3310/hta18580. Review.


Cost Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies.

Patel SS, Kilgore ML.

Cancer Control. 2015 Apr;22(2):248-58. Review.


The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bariatric (weight loss) surgery for obesity: a systematic review and economic evaluation.

Picot J, Jones J, Colquitt JL, Gospodarevskaya E, Loveman E, Baxter L, Clegg AJ.

Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(41):1-190, 215-357, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13410. Review.


Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy.

Zauber AG.

Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2010 Oct;20(4):751-70. doi: 10.1016/j.giec.2010.07.008. Review.


Systematic review and economic evaluation of bevacizumab and cetuximab for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

Tappenden P, Jones R, Paisley S, Carroll C.

Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(12):1-128, iii-iv. Review.


A Systematic Review of Studies Evaluating the Cost Utility of Screening High-Risk Populations for Latent Tuberculosis Infection.

Campbell JR, Sasitharan T, Marra F.

Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2015 Aug;13(4):325-40. doi: 10.1007/s40258-015-0183-4. Review.


Virtual gastrointestinal colonoscopy in combination with large bowel endoscopy: clinical application.

He Q, Rao T, Guan YS.

World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13820-32. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13820. Review.


Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Knudsen AB, Brenner H.

Epidemiol Rev. 2011;33:88-100. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxr004. Epub 2011 Jun 1. Review.


Cancer Screening in Older Adults.

Snyder AH, Magnuson A, Westcott AM.

Med Clin North Am. 2016 Sep;100(5):1101-10. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2016.04.016. Review.


Individualizing cancer screening in older adults: a narrative review and framework for future research.

Eckstrom E, Feeny DH, Walter LC, Perdue LA, Whitlock EP.

J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Feb;28(2):292-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2227-x. Epub 2012 Sep 28. Review.


Economic evaluation of targeted cancer interventions: critical review and recommendations.

Elkin EB, Marshall DA, Kulin NA, Ferrusi IL, Hassett MJ, Ladabaum U, Phillips KA.

Genet Med. 2011 Oct;13(10):853-60. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821f3e64. Review.


Non-medical costs of colonoscopy.

Petryszyn PW, Kempiński R, Michałowicz J, Poniewierka E.

Prz Gastroenterol. 2014;9(5):270-4. doi: 10.5114/pg.2014.46161. Epub 2014 Oct 19. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center