Format

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

See comment in PubMed Commons below
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2012 Mar-Apr;43(2):97-108. doi: 10.3928/15428877-20111222-02. Epub 2012 Jan 3.

Reproducibility of macular thickness measurement among five OCT instruments: effects of image resolution, image registration, and eye tracking.

Author information

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology & Vision Science, University of California Davis Eye Center, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:

To study the effect of image resolution, eye tracking, and image registration on central macular thickness reproducibility (rCMT) among spectral-domain and time-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT and TD-OCT) instruments.

PATIENTS AND METHODS:

Seventy-six eyes were imaged (44 normal, 32 maculopathy) either twice using four SD-OCT and one TD-OCT devices or three times using Spectralis SD-OCT (with and without eye tracking) (Heidelberg Engineering, Inc., Heidelberg, Germany). Cirrus images (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA) were further analyzed with three-point image registration.

RESULTS:

All instruments had superior rCMT in normal versus pathologic eyes (P < .001). No difference in rCMT was noted among instruments in normal eyes (P = .92), but TD-OCT was superior to SD-OCT (P = .017) in pathologic eyes. Cirrus image registration improved rCMT for normal eyes (P = .04), with borderline improvement in pathologic eyes (P = .06). Spectralis eye tracking improved rCMT in normal (P = .01) and pathologic (P = .004) eyes.

CONCLUSION:

Higher image resolution with SD-OCT may not improve rCMT, but image registration and eye tracking options may improve rCMT.

Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for SLACK Incorporated.
    Loading ...
    Write to the Help Desk