Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 40

1.

Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials.

Upadhyaya CD, Wu JC, Trost G, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Tay B, Coric D, Mummaneni PV.

J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Mar;16(3):216-28. doi: 10.3171/2011.6.SPINE10623. Epub 2011 Dec 23.

PMID:
22195608
2.

Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Boselie TF, Willems PC, van Mameren H, de Bie R, Benzel EC, van Santbrink H.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Sep 12;(9):CD009173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009173.pub2. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(5):CD009173.

PMID:
22972137
4.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zou S, Gao J, Xu B, Lu X, Han Y, Meng H.

Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17. Review.

PMID:
27314663
5.

Cervical disc arthroplasty for symptomatic cervical disc disease: Traditional and Bayesian meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Kan SL, Yuan ZF, Ning GZ, Liu FF, Sun JC, Feng SQ.

Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:111-119. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.088. Epub 2016 Oct 2. Review.

PMID:
27693477
6.
7.

Mid- to long-term outcomes after cervical disc arthroplasty compared with anterior discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ren C, Song Y, Xue Y, Yang X.

Eur Spine J. 2014 May;23(5):1115-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3220-3. Epub 2014 Feb 11. Review.

PMID:
24515337
8.

Comparison of artificial cervical arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for one-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Luo J, Huang S, Gong M, Dai X, Gao M, Yu T, Zhou Z, Zou X.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S115-25. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1510-4. Epub 2014 Jul 18. Review.

PMID:
25034189
9.

Cervical arthroplasty: what does the labeling say?

Turel MK, Kerolus MG, Adogwa O, Traynelis VC.

Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E2. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16414. Review.

PMID:
28142245
10.

Adjacent segment pathology following cervical motion-sparing procedures or devices compared with fusion surgery: a systematic review.

Harrod CC, Hilibrand AS, Fischer DJ, Skelly AC.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S96-S112. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826cb2d6. Review.

PMID:
22872222
11.

Reoperation After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-analysis.

Zhong ZM, Zhu SY, Zhuang JS, Wu Q, Chen JT.

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1307-16. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4707-5. Epub 2016 Feb 1. Review. Erratum in: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Mar;475(3):927.

12.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials: comparison of total disk replacement with anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Yu L, Song Y, Yang X, Lv C.

Orthopedics. 2011 Oct 5;34(10):e651-8. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110826-09. Review.

PMID:
21956061
13.

The incidence of adjacent segment degeneration after cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA): a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yang B, Li H, Zhang T, He X, Xu S.

PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035032. Epub 2012 Apr 25. Review.

14.

Minimum four-year subsequent surgery rates of cervical disc replacement versus fusion: A meta-analysis of prospective randomized clinical trials.

Wu TK, Liu H, Wang BY, Meng Y.

Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Feb;103(1):45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.008. Epub 2016 Nov 24. Review.

PMID:
27890691
15.

Treating multi-level cervical disc disease with hybrid surgery compared to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lu VM, Zhang L, Scherman DB, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ, Phan K.

Eur Spine J. 2017 Feb;26(2):546-557. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4791-y. Epub 2016 Sep 27. Review.

PMID:
27679431
16.
17.

WITHDRAWN: Arthroplasty versus fusion in single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Boselie TF, Willems PC, van Mameren H, de Bie R, Benzel EC, van Santbrink H.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 21;(5):CD009173. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009173.pub3. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
25994307
18.

Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty versus arthrodesis for single-level cervical spondylosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Fallah A, Akl EA, Ebrahim S, Ibrahim GM, Mansouri A, Foote CJ, Zhang Y, Fehlings MG.

PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043407. Epub 2012 Aug 17. Review.

19.

Adjacent segment disease requiring reoperation in cervical total disc arthroplasty: A literature review and update.

Chang KE, Pham MH, Hsieh PC.

J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Mar;37:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.10.047. Epub 2016 Nov 16. Review.

PMID:
27865820
20.

Comparison of the short- and long-term treatment effect of cervical disk replacement and anterior cervical disk fusion: a meta-analysis.

Muheremu A, Niu X, Wu Z, Muhanmode Y, Tian W.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25 Suppl 1:S87-100. doi: 10.1007/s00590-014-1469-1. Epub 2014 May 5. Review.

PMID:
24791930

Supplemental Content

Support Center