Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 28

1.

Literature search strategies to comply with institutional animal care and use committee review requirements.

Nesdill D, Adams KM.

J Vet Med Educ. 2011 Summer;38(2):150-6. doi: 10.3138/jvme.38.2.150.

PMID:
22023923
2.

Using animals in research, testing and teaching.

Gauthier C, Griffin G.

Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Aug;24(2):735-45. Review.

PMID:
16358523
3.

IACUC review of nonhuman primate research.

Tardif SD, Coleman K, Hobbs TR, Lutz C.

ILAR J. 2013;54(2):234-45. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilt040. Review.

4.

A retrospective review of postapproval monitoring at a large academic institution.

Vanderford DA, Doss S, Banks RE.

Lab Anim (NY). 2015 Oct;44(10):395-401. doi: 10.1038/laban.856. Review.

PMID:
26398614
5.

Barriers to assessment and treatment of pain in laboratory animals.

Karas AZ.

Lab Anim (NY). 2006 Jul-Aug;35(7):38-45. Review.

PMID:
16807565
6.
7.

What investigators need to know about the use of animals.

Silk SB, Hampton LL, Brown PA.

ILAR J. 2014;54(3):324-8. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilt046. Review.

PMID:
24615446
8.

Institutional animal care and use committee considerations for animal models of peripheral neuropathy.

Brabb T, Carbone L, Snyder J, Phillips N.

ILAR J. 2014;54(3):329-37. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilt045. Review.

9.

Best practices for animal care committees and animal use oversight.

DeHaven WR.

ILAR J. 2002;43 Suppl:S59-62. Review.

PMID:
12388853
10.

IACUC Considerations for the Use of Livestock in Translational Research.

Thulin JD, Underwood WJ.

ILAR J. 2015;56(1):139-46. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilv003. Review.

PMID:
25991705
11.

IACUC issues associated with amphibian research.

Alworth LC, Harvey SB.

ILAR J. 2007;48(3):278-89. Review.

PMID:
17592190
12.

Should IACUCs review scientific merit of animal research projects?

Mann MD, Prentice ED.

Lab Anim (NY). 2004 Jan;33(1):26-31. Review.

PMID:
14752528
13.

A unique application to the IACUC for studies of wild animals in or from natural settings.

Lindzey J, Gower W, Mushinsky H, Owens U, Graham L, Gografe S, Van Etten J, Engelman R.

Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2002 Nov;41(6):33-6. Review.

PMID:
12456158
14.

Decerebrate mammalian preparations: unalleviated or fully alleviated pain? A review and opinion.

Silverman J, Garnett NL, Giszter SF, Heckman CJ 2nd, Kulpa-Eddy JA, Lemay MA, Perry CK, Pinter M.

Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2005 Jul;44(4):34-6. Review.

PMID:
16050666
15.

The role of the IACUC in ensuring research reproducibility.

Silverman J, Macy J, Preisig PA.

Lab Anim (NY). 2017 Mar 22;46(4):129-135. doi: 10.1038/laban.1213. Review.

PMID:
28328872
16.

Species-specific assessment of pain in laboratory animals.

Stasiak KL, Maul D, French E, Hellyer PW, VandeWoude S.

Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci. 2003 Jul;42(4):13-20. Review.

PMID:
12906396
17.

Humane endpoints for laboratory animals used in regulatory testing.

Stokes WS.

ILAR J. 2002;43 Suppl:S31-8. Review.

PMID:
12388849
18.

Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals.

National Research Council (US) Committee on Recognition and Alleviation of Pain in Laboratory Animals.

Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009.

19.
20.

A critique of the animal procedures committee report on biotechnology.

Jenkins ES, Combes RD.

Altern Lab Anim. 2002 Jan-Feb;30(1):131-4. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
11827576

Supplemental Content

Support Center