Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 37

1.

The responsiveness of quality of life utilities to change in depression: a comparison of instruments (SF-6D, EQ-5D, and DFD).

Gerhards SA, Huibers MJ, Theunissen KA, de Graaf LE, Widdershoven GA, Evers SM.

Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):732-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.12.004. Epub 2011 May 6.

2.

Validity and responsiveness of EuroQol-5 dimension (EQ-5D) versus Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) questionnaire in chronic pain.

Obradovic M, Lal A, Liedgens H.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Jul 1;11:110. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-110. Review.

3.

Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

Walters SJ, Brazier JE.

Qual Life Res. 2005 Aug;14(6):1523-32. Review.

PMID:
16110932
4.

Utility scores for different health states related to depression: individual participant data analysis.

Kolovos S, Bosmans JE, van Dongen JM, van Esveld B, Magai D, van Straten A, van der Feltz-Cornelis C, van Steenbergen-Weijenburg KM, Huijbregts KM, van Marwijk H, Riper H, van Tulder MW.

Qual Life Res. 2017 Jul;26(7):1649-1658. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1536-2. Epub 2017 Mar 4. Review.

5.

EQ-5D in skin conditions: an assessment of validity and responsiveness.

Yang Y, Brazier J, Longworth L.

Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Dec;16(9):927-39. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0638-9. Epub 2014 Oct 31. Review.

6.

A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures.

Brazier J, Connell J, Papaioannou D, Mukuria C, Mulhern B, Peasgood T, Jones ML, Paisley S, O'Cathain A, Barkham M, Knapp M, Byford S, Gilbody S, Parry G.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(34):vii-viii, xiii-xxv, 1-188. doi: 10.3310/hta18340. Review.

7.

A review of preference-based health-related quality of life questionnaires in spinal cord injury research.

Whitehurst DG, Noonan VK, Dvorak MF, Bryan S.

Spinal Cord. 2012 Sep;50(9):646-54. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.46. Epub 2012 May 29. Review.

PMID:
22641255
8.

Measuring health-related quality of life for child maltreatment: a systematic literature review.

Prosser LA, Corso PS.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jul 16;5:42. Review.

9.

A systematic literature review of utility weights in wet age-related macular degeneration.

Pearson I, Rycroft C, Irving A, Ainsworth C, Wittrup-Jensen K.

J Med Econ. 2013 Nov;16(11):1307-16. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.839946. Epub 2013 Sep 19. Review.

PMID:
24004384
10.

How valid and responsive are generic health status measures, such as EQ-5D and SF-36, in schizophrenia? A systematic review.

Papaioannou D, Brazier J, Parry G.

Value Health. 2011 Sep-Oct;14(6):907-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.04.006. Epub 2011 Jul 28. Review.

11.

Comparison of direct and indirect methods of estimating health state utilities for resource allocation: review and empirical analysis.

Arnold D, Girling A, Stevens A, Lilford R.

BMJ. 2009 Jul 22;339:b2688. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2688. Review.

PMID:
22128393
12.

A review of the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D in people with urinary incontinence.

Davis S, Wailoo A.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Feb 18;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-20. Review.

13.

Generic Preference-based Measures for Low Back Pain: Which of Them Should Be Used?

Finch AP, Dritsaki M, Jommi C.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Mar;41(6):E364-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001247. Review.

14.

Systematic review and empirical comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D group mean scores.

Whitehurst DG, Bryan S, Lewis M.

Med Decis Making. 2011 Nov-Dec;31(6):E34-44. doi: 10.1177/0272989X11421529. Epub 2011 Oct 12. Review.

PMID:
21993430
15.

Can The EQ-5D Detect Meaningful Change? A Systematic Review.

Payakachat N, Ali MM, Tilford JM.

Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Nov;33(11):1137-54. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0295-6. Review.

16.

An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment.

Yang Y, Longworth L, Brazier J.

Qual Life Res. 2013 Dec;22(10):2813-28. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0417-6. Epub 2013 May 26. Review.

17.

A systematic literature review of health state utility values in head and neck cancer.

Meregaglia M, Cairns J.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Sep 2;15(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0748-z. Review.

18.

The role of the EQ-5D in the economic evaluation of dermatological conditions and therapies.

Pereira FR, Basra MK, Finlay AY, Salek MS.

Dermatology. 2012;225(1):45-53. doi: 10.1159/000339865. Epub 2012 Aug 25. Review.

PMID:
22922888
19.

Review of studies mapping from quality of life or clinical measures to EQ-5D: an online database.

Dakin H.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Sep 5;11:151. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-151. Review.

20.

Health state utility values associated with advanced gastric, oesophageal, or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review.

Carter GC, King DT, Hess LM, Mitchell SA, Taipale KL, Kiiskinen U, Rajan N, Novick D, Liepa AM.

J Med Econ. 2015;18(11):954-66. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1066380. Epub 2015 Sep 11. Review.

PMID:
26212479

Supplemental Content

Support Center