Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 16

1.

DNA polymerases provide a canon of strategies for translesion synthesis past oxidatively generated lesions.

Zahn KE, Wallace SS, Doublié S.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011 Jun;21(3):358-69. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Apr 7. Review.

2.

Structure of human DNA polymerase iota and the mechanism of DNA synthesis.

Makarova AV, Kulbachinskiy AV.

Biochemistry (Mosc). 2012 Jun;77(6):547-61. doi: 10.1134/S0006297912060016. Review.

PMID:
22817454
3.

Translesion DNA synthesis: polymerase response to altered nucleotides.

Strauss BS.

Cancer Surv. 1985;4(3):493-516. Review.

PMID:
2825983
4.

Specialized DNA polymerases, cellular survival, and the genesis of mutations.

Friedberg EC, Wagner R, Radman M.

Science. 2002 May 31;296(5573):1627-30. Review.

PMID:
12040171
5.

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by eukaryotic replicative and translesion synthesis polymerases.

McCulloch SD, Kunkel TA.

Cell Res. 2008 Jan;18(1):148-61. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.4. Review.

6.

Functions of eukaryotic DNA polymerases.

Shcherbakova PV, Bebenek K, Kunkel TA.

Sci Aging Knowledge Environ. 2003 Feb 26;2003(8):RE3. Review.

PMID:
12844548
7.

Replication of damaged DNA.

Lehmann AR.

Cell Cycle. 2003 Jul-Aug;2(4):300-2. Review.

PMID:
12851478
8.

Crystal structure analysis of DNA lesion repair and tolerance mechanisms.

Schneider S, Schorr S, Carell T.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Feb;19(1):87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.01.005. Epub 2009 Feb 4. Review. Erratum in: Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2009 Apr;19(2):233.

PMID:
19200715
9.

Trading places: how do DNA polymerases switch during translesion DNA synthesis?

Friedberg EC, Lehmann AR, Fuchs RP.

Mol Cell. 2005 May 27;18(5):499-505. Review. Erratum in: Mol Cell. 2005 Jul 1;19(1):143.

10.

Translesion DNA synthesis: little fingers teach tolerance.

Fleck O, Schär P.

Curr Biol. 2004 May 25;14(10):R389-91. Review.

11.

Bumps in the road: how replicative DNA polymerases see DNA damage.

Hogg M, Wallace SS, Doublié S.

Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2005 Feb;15(1):86-93. Review.

PMID:
15718138
12.

Evolving views of DNA replication (in)fidelity.

Kunkel TA.

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2009;74:91-101. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.027. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Review.

13.

Modulation of mutagenesis in eukaryotes by DNA replication fork dynamics and quality of nucleotide pools.

Waisertreiger IS, Liston VG, Menezes MR, Kim HM, Lobachev KS, Stepchenkova EI, Tahirov TH, Rogozin IB, Pavlov YI.

Environ Mol Mutagen. 2012 Dec;53(9):699-724. doi: 10.1002/em.21735. Epub 2012 Oct 10. Review.

14.

Contributions of the specialised DNA polymerases to replication of structured DNA.

Wickramasinghe CM, Arzouk H, Frey A, Maiter A, Sale JE.

DNA Repair (Amst). 2015 May;29:83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Feb 11. Review.

PMID:
25704659
15.

Investigating the biochemical impact of DNA damage with structure-based probes: abasic sites, photodimers, alkylation adducts, and oxidative lesions.

Dahlmann HA, Vaidyanathan VG, Sturla SJ.

Biochemistry. 2009 Oct 13;48(40):9347-59. doi: 10.1021/bi901059k. Review.

16.

DNA polymerases at the eukaryotic fork-20 years later.

Pavlov YI, Shcherbakova PV.

Mutat Res. 2010 Mar 1;685(1-2):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Aug 12. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center