Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 19

1.

Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems.

Wright A, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Feblowitz J, Meltzer S, McMullen C, Guappone K, Carpenter J, Richardson J, Simonaitis L, Evans RS, Nichol WP, Middleton B.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 1;18(3):232-42. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000113. Epub 2011 Mar 17.

2.

Electronic health records and the management of women at high risk of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Drohan B, Ozanne EM, Hughes KS.

Breast J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15 Suppl 1:S46-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2009.00796.x. Review.

PMID:
19775330
3.

Comparison of electronic health record system functionalities to support the patient recruitment process in clinical trials.

Schreiweis B, Trinczek B, Köpcke F, Leusch T, Majeed RW, Wenk J, Bergh B, Ohmann C, Röhrig R, Dugas M, Prokosch HU.

Int J Med Inform. 2014 Nov;83(11):860-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 25. Review.

PMID:
25189709
4.

Criteria for assessing high-priority drug-drug interactions for clinical decision support in electronic health records.

Phansalkar S, Desai A, Choksi A, Yoshida E, Doole J, Czochanski M, Tucker AD, Middleton B, Bell D, Bates DW.

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013 Jun 13;13(1):65. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-65. Review.

5.

Future of electronic health records: implications for decision support.

Rothman B, Leonard JC, Vigoda MM.

Mt Sinai J Med. 2012 Nov-Dec;79(6):757-68. doi: 10.1002/msj.21351. Review.

PMID:
23239213
6.

Providing nutrition support in the electronic health record era: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Vanek VW.

Nutr Clin Pract. 2012 Dec;27(6):718-37. doi: 10.1177/0884533612463440. Epub 2012 Oct 16. Review.

PMID:
23077115
7.

Electronic Medical Record-Integrated Pharmacogenomics and Related Clinical Decision Support Concepts.

Caraballo PJ, Bielinski SJ, St Sauver JL, Weinshilboum RM.

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017 Aug;102(2):254-264. doi: 10.1002/cpt.707. Epub 2017 May 26. Review.

PMID:
28390138
8.

Core Functionality in Pediatric Electronic Health Records [Internet].

Dufendach KR, Eichenberger JA, McPheeters ML, Temple MW, Bhatia HL, Alrifai MW, Potter SA, Weinberg ST, Johnson KB, Lehmann CU.

Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 Apr.

9.

Clinical decision support systems.

Beeler PE, Bates DW, Hug BL.

Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Dec 23;144:w14073. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.14073. eCollection 2014. Review.

10.

Costs and benefits of health information technology.

Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Keeler EB.

Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2006 Apr;(132):1-71. Review.

11.

High-priority drug-drug interactions for use in electronic health records.

Phansalkar S, Desai AA, Bell D, Yoshida E, Doole J, Czochanski M, Middleton B, Bates DW.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):735-43. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000612. Epub 2012 Apr 26.

12.
13.

Computerized decision support in adult and pediatric critical care.

Williams CN, Bratton SL, Hirshberg EL.

World J Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 4;2(4):21-8. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v2.i4.21. eCollection 2013 Nov 4. Review.

14.

Clinical Decision Support and the Electronic Health Record-Applications for Physiatry.

Shoolin JS.

PM R. 2017 May;9(5S):S34-S40. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2017.01.008. Review.

PMID:
28527501
15.

Integrated precision medicine: the role of electronic health records in delivering personalized treatment.

Sitapati A, Kim H, Berkovich B, Marmor R, Singh S, El-Kareh R, Clay B, Ohno-Machado L.

Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2017 May;9(3). doi: 10.1002/wsbm.1378. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Review.

PMID:
28207198
16.

Clinical decision support for colon and rectal surgery: an overview.

McCoy AB, Melton GB, Wright A, Sittig DF.

Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2013 Mar;26(1):23-30. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1333644. Review.

17.

Intraoperative Clinical Decision Support for Anesthesia: A Narrative Review of Available Systems.

Nair BG, Gabel E, Hofer I, Schwid HA, Cannesson M.

Anesth Analg. 2017 Feb;124(2):603-617. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001636. Review.

PMID:
28099325
18.

Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research.

Weiskopf NG, Weng C.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Jan 1;20(1):144-51. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000681. Epub 2012 Jun 25. Review.

19.

Review and evaluation of electronic health records-driven phenotype algorithm authoring tools for clinical and translational research.

Xu J, Rasmussen LV, Shaw PL, Jiang G, Kiefer RC, Mo H, Pacheco JA, Speltz P, Zhu Q, Denny JC, Pathak J, Thompson WK, Montague E.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Nov;22(6):1251-60. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv070. Epub 2015 Jul 29. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center