Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 24

1.

Aneuploidy confers quantitative proteome changes and phenotypic variation in budding yeast.

Pavelka N, Rancati G, Zhu J, Bradford WD, Saraf A, Florens L, Sanderson BW, Hattem GL, Li R.

Nature. 2010 Nov 11;468(7321):321-5. doi: 10.1038/nature09529. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

2.

Effects of aneuploidy on gene expression: implications for cancer.

Dürrbaum M, Storchová Z.

FEBS J. 2016 Mar;283(5):791-802. doi: 10.1111/febs.13591. Epub 2015 Dec 8. Review.

3.

Yeast: a simple model system to study complex phenomena of aneuploidy.

Mulla W, Zhu J, Li R.

FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014 Mar;38(2):201-12. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12048. Epub 2013 Oct 31. Review.

4.

Ploidy changes and genome stability in yeast.

Storchova Z.

Yeast. 2014 Nov;31(11):421-30. doi: 10.1002/yea.3037. Epub 2014 Sep 3. Review.

5.

Dynamic karyotype, dynamic proteome: buffering the effects of aneuploidy.

Donnelly N, Storchová Z.

Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Feb;1843(2):473-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.11.017. Epub 2013 Dec 1. Review.

6.

Utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify aneuploidy and cancer susceptibility genes.

Strome ED, Plon SE.

Methods Mol Biol. 2010;653:73-85. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-759-4_5. Review.

PMID:
20721738
7.

Proteomics to assess the role of phenotypic plasticity in aquatic organisms exposed to pollution and global warming.

Silvestre F, Gillardin V, Dorts J.

Integr Comp Biol. 2012 Nov;52(5):681-94. doi: 10.1093/icb/ics087. Epub 2012 May 28. Review.

PMID:
22641836
8.

Yeast as Models of Mitotic Fidelity.

Torres E.

Recent Results Cancer Res. 2015;200:143-64. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20291-4_7. Review.

PMID:
26376876
9.

Ploidy plasticity: a rapid and reversible strategy for adaptation to stress.

Berman J.

FEMS Yeast Res. 2016 May;16(3). pii: fow020. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fow020. Epub 2016 Mar 4. Review.

PMID:
26945893
10.

The molecular basis of phenotypic variation in yeast.

Fay JC.

Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2013 Dec;23(6):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2013.10.005. Epub 2013 Nov 21. Review.

11.

Consequences of Aneuploidy in Cancer: Transcriptome and Beyond.

Dürrbaum M, Storchová Z.

Recent Results Cancer Res. 2015;200:195-224. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-20291-4_9. Review.

PMID:
26376878
12.

Balancing the checks: surveillance of chromosomal exchange during meiosis.

Börner GV.

Biochem Soc Trans. 2006 Aug;34(Pt 4):554-6. Review.

PMID:
16856858
13.

Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: role of aneuploidy in cellular adaptation and cancer.

Pavelka N, Rancati G, Li R.

Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010 Dec;22(6):809-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.06.003. Epub 2010 Jul 23. Review.

14.

The Consequences of Chromosome Segregation Errors in Mitosis and Meiosis.

Potapova T, Gorbsky GJ.

Biology (Basel). 2017 Feb 8;6(1). pii: E12. doi: 10.3390/biology6010012. Review.

15.

The aneuploidy paradox: costs and benefits of an incorrect karyotype.

Sheltzer JM, Amon A.

Trends Genet. 2011 Nov;27(11):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2011.07.003. Epub 2011 Aug 26. Review.

16.

Ploidy dynamics and evolvability in fungi.

Wertheimer NB, Stone N, Berman J.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Dec 5;371(1709). pii: 20150461. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0461. Review.

17.

Ploidy Variation in Fungi: Polyploidy, Aneuploidy, and Genome Evolution.

Todd RT, Forche A, Selmecki A.

Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Jul;5(4). doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0051-2016. Review.

18.

New insights into the troubles of aneuploidy.

Siegel JJ, Amon A.

Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2012;28:189-214. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155807. Epub 2012 Jul 9. Review.

19.

A System to Study Aneuploidy In Vivo.

Pfau SJ, Amon A.

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2015;80:93-101. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2015.80.027193. Epub 2016 Mar 2. Review.

20.

Gene copy-number alterations: a cost-benefit analysis.

Tang YC, Amon A.

Cell. 2013 Jan 31;152(3):394-405. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.043. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center