Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 11

1.

Implementation of a journal peer reviewer stratification system based on quality and reliability.

Green SM, Callaham ML.

Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Feb;57(2):149-152.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Oct 13.

PMID:
20947204
2.

Peer review of the biomedical literature.

Olson CM.

Am J Emerg Med. 1990 Jul;8(4):356-8. Review.

PMID:
2194471
3.

Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?

Morton JP.

Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):7-9. doi: 10.1152/advan.90207.2008. Review.

4.
5.

Interrater reliability in clinical trials of depressive disorders.

Mulsant BH, Kastango KB, Rosen J, Stone RA, Mazumdar S, Pollock BG.

Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;159(9):1598-600. Review.

PMID:
12202285
6.

How to review a scientific paper.

Tandon R.

Asian J Psychiatr. 2014 Oct;11:124-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Aug 27. Review.

PMID:
25248566
7.

Stroke journal: what is being published to advance the field?

Saposnik G, Johnston SC, Raptis S, Ovbiagele B, Fisher M; Stroke Journal Editorial Board.

Stroke. 2013 Sep;44(9):2644-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001999. Epub 2013 Aug 1. Review. No abstract available.

8.

Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Moher D.

BMC Med. 2015 Nov 2;13:274. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0509-y. Review.

9.

Peer review: a constantly-evolving scientific process.

Ara├║jo CG.

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012 Feb;98(2):e32-5. Review. English, Portuguese, Spanish. No abstract available.

10.

The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care.

Goldman RL.

JAMA. 1992 Feb 19;267(7):958-60. Review.

PMID:
1734109
11.

Peer review of adverse events - a perspective on Macarthur.

Masso M.

Aust Health Rev. 2004;28(1):26-33. Review.

PMID:
15525248

Supplemental Content

Support Center