Format

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Oct;32(4):836-46. doi: 10.1002/jmri.22323.

Neuropathological differences between rats and mice after spinal cord injury.

Author information

  • 1Department of Neuroscience, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To investigate the utility of noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols to demonstrate pathological differences between rats and mice after spinal cord injury (SCI). Rats and mice are commonly used to model SCI; however, histology and immunohistochemistry have shown differences in neuropathology between the two species, including cavity formation and scar/inflammatory responses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Moderate contusion SCI was performed on adult male rats and mice. At 28 days postinjury, animals underwent T1-weighted (T1W), with or without gadolinium contrast, or T2-weighted (T2W) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), to be compared with histology at the same timepoint.

RESULTS:

In both species, all MRI methods demonstrated changes in spinal cord anatomy. Immunohistochemistry indicated that T2W accurately reflected areas of inflammation and glial scar formation in rats and mice. Quantitation of lesion volume by histology and functional performance correlated best with T2W measurements in both species. Gadolinium contrast accurately reflected the blood-spinal cord-barrier permeability in both species, which appeared greater in rats than in mice.

CONCLUSION:

These data demonstrate that MRI, with either a T1W or T2W protocol, can effectively distinguish pathological differences between rats and mice.

PMID:
20882614
PMCID:
PMC2949295
DOI:
10.1002/jmri.22323
[PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
    Loading ...
    Support Center