Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 30

1.

Assessing equity in systematic reviews: realising the recommendations of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health.

Tugwell P, Petticrew M, Kristjansson E, Welch V, Ueffing E, Waters E, Bonnefoy J, Morgan A, Doohan E, Kelly MP.

BMJ. 2010 Sep 13;341:c4739. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4739. No abstract available.

PMID:
20837575
3.

Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies.

Reed D, Price EG, Windish DM, Wright SM, Gozu A, Hsu EB, Beach MC, Kern D, Bass EB.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1080-9. Review.

PMID:
15968033
4.

Evidence-based dental care--a concept review.

Nainar SM.

Pediatr Dent. 1998 Nov-Dec;20(7):418-21. Review.

PMID:
9866146
5.

Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 4. Assessing heterogeneity of primary studies in systematic reviews and whether to combine their results.

Hatala R, Keitz S, Wyer P, Guyatt G; Evidence-Based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group.

CMAJ. 2005 Mar 1;172(5):661-5. Review. No abstract available.

6.

AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Chou R, Aronson N, Atkins D, Ismaila AS, Santaguida P, Smith DH, Whitlock E, Wilt TJ, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):502-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Sep 26. Review.

PMID:
18823754
7.

[The practice of systematic reviews. I. Introduction].

Offringa M, de Craen AJ.

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1999 Mar 27;143(13):653-6. Review. Dutch.

PMID:
10321295
8.
9.

Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Relevo R, Balshem H.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jun 17. Review.

PMID:
21684115
10.

Why certain systematic reviews reach uncertain conclusions.

Petticrew M.

BMJ. 2003 Apr 5;326(7392):756-8. Review. No abstract available.

11.

Best practice for prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease through an equity lens: a review.

Beauchamp A, Peeters A, Tonkin A, Turrell G.

Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Oct;17(5):599-606. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328339cc99. Review.

PMID:
20562629
12.

Systematic reviews: gatekeepers of nursing knowledge.

Evans D, Pearson A.

J Clin Nurs. 2001 Sep;10(5):593-9. Review.

PMID:
11822509
13.

Tailoring systematic reviews to meet critical priorities in maternal health in the intrapartum period.

Viswanathan M.

Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;22 Suppl 1:10-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00907.x. Review.

PMID:
18237347
14.

Systematic reviews: the heart of evidence-based practice.

Stevens KR.

AACN Clin Issues. 2001 Nov;12(4):529-38. Review.

PMID:
11759425
15.

Challenges in systematic reviews of therapeutic devices and procedures.

Hartling L, McAlister FA, Rowe BH, Ezekowitz J, Friesen C, Klassen TP.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1100-11. Review.

PMID:
15968035
16.

Pitfalls in systematic reviews.

Farquhar C, Vail A.

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Aug;18(4):433-9. Review.

PMID:
16794425
17.

Using evidence in pain practice: Part I: Assessing quality of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.

Chou R.

Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;9(5):518-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2008.00422_1.x. Review.

PMID:
18346062
18.
19.

Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine topics.

Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Suttorp MJ, Buscemi N, Friesen C; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1042-7. Review.

PMID:
15968028
20.

Systematic reviews reveal unrepresentative evidence for the development of drug formularies for poor and nonwhite populations.

Odierna DH, Bero LA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Dec;62(12):1268-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.009. Epub 2009 Apr 17. Review.

PMID:
19375890

Supplemental Content

Support Center