Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 37

1.

Improved reporting of statistical design and analysis: guidelines, education, and editorial policies.

Mazumdar M, Banerjee S, Van Epps HL.

Methods Mol Biol. 2010;620:563-98. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-580-4_22.

PMID:
20652522
2.

Statistical analysis and reporting: common errors found during peer review and how to avoid them.

Worthy G.

Swiss Med Wkly. 2015 Feb 4;145:w14076. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14076. eCollection 2015. Review.

3.

Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?

Morton JP.

Adv Physiol Educ. 2009 Mar;33(1):7-9. doi: 10.1152/advan.90207.2008. Review.

PMID:
19261753
4.

Review article: reporting guidelines in the biomedical literature.

O'Leary JD, Crawford MW.

Can J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;60(8):813-21. doi: 10.1007/s12630-013-9973-z. Epub 2013 Jun 13. Review.

PMID:
23760791
5.
6.

Publication guidelines need widespread adoption.

Larson EL, Cortazal M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Oct 15. Review.

PMID:
22000815
7.

How to improve reliability and efficiency of research about molecular markers: roles of phases, guidelines, and study design.

Ransohoff DF.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Dec;60(12):1205-19. Epub 2007 Sep 24. Review.

PMID:
17998073
8.

Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals.

Wager E, Middleton P.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 8;(4):MR000002. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000002.pub3. Review.

PMID:
18843753
9.

Technical editing of research reports in biomedical journals.

Wager E, Middleton P.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000002. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(4):MR000002.

PMID:
17443626
10.

Use of statistical analysis in the biomedical informatics literature.

Scotch M, Duggal M, Brandt C, Lin Z, Shiffman R.

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Jan-Feb;17(1):3-5. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M2853. Review.

11.
12.

Reporting quality of survival analyses in medical journals still needs improvement. A minimal requirements proposal.

Abraira V, Muriel A, Emparanza JI, Pijoan JI, Royuela A, Plana MN, Cano A, Urreta I, Zamora J.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;66(12):1340-6.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Sep 7. Review.

PMID:
24018345
14.

Advice on statistical analysis for Circulation Research.

Kusuoka H, Hoffman JI.

Circ Res. 2002 Oct 18;91(8):662-71. Review.

15.

Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.

Jefferson T, Rudin M, Brodney Folse S, Davidoff F.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Apr 18;(2):MR000016. Review.

16.

Statistics in medical research.

Sprent P.

Swiss Med Wkly. 2003 Oct 11;133(39-40):522-9. Review.

PMID:
14655052
17.

Formalizing the definition of meta-analysis in Molecular Ecology.

ArchMiller AA, Bauer EF, Koch RE, Wijayawardena BK, Anil A, Kottwitz JJ, Munsterman AS, Wilson AE.

Mol Ecol. 2015 Aug;24(16):4042-51. doi: 10.1111/mec.13264. Epub 2015 Jul 2. Review.

PMID:
26059541
18.

Ethics in neonatal pain research.

Axelin A, Salanterä S.

Nurs Ethics. 2008 Jul;15(4):492-9. doi: 10.1177/0969733007086017. Review.

PMID:
18515438
19.

Statistical method use in public health research.

Karran JC, Moodie EE, Wallace MP.

Scand J Public Health. 2015 Nov;43(7):776-82. doi: 10.1177/1403494815592735. Epub 2015 Jul 10. Review.

PMID:
26163023
20.

The null hypothesis: closing the gap between good intentions and good studies.

Meldrum DR, Sammel MD, Barnhart K.

Fertil Steril. 2011 Jul;96(1):6-10.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.031. Review.

PMID:
21723439

Supplemental Content

Support Center