Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 31

1.

Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US Experience.

Finkelstein J, Eckersberger E, Sadri H, Taneja SS, Lepor H, Djavan B.

Rev Urol. 2010 Winter;12(1):35-43.

2.

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy.

Agarwal G, Valderrama O, Luchey AM, Pow-Sang JM.

Cancer Control. 2015 Jul;22(3):283-90. Review.

3.

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy a review of the literature and comparison with open techniques.

Omar AM, Townell N.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;7(4):295-301. Review.

PMID:
15365578
4.

[Critical comparative analysis between open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: urinary continence and sexual function (part II)].

Romero Otero J, Martínez-Salamanca JI.

Arch Esp Urol. 2007 Sep;60(7):767-76. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
17937336
5.

[Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy versus robotic].

Cáceres F, Sánchez C, Martínez-Piñeiro L, Tabernero A, Alonso S, Cisneros J, Cabrera Castillo PM, Alvarez Maestro M, Martín Hernández M, Pérez-Utrilla Pérez M, de la Peña JJ.

Arch Esp Urol. 2007 May;60(4):430-8. Review. Spanish.

PMID:
17626535
6.

Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Herrmann TR, Rabenalt R, Stolzenburg JU, Liatsikos EN, Imkamp F, Tezval H, Gross AJ, Jonas U, Burchardt M.

World J Urol. 2007 Apr;25(2):149-60. Epub 2007 Mar 13. Review.

PMID:
17354014
7.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, or robotic radical prostatectomy: is there any real difference?

Healy KA, Gomella LG.

Semin Oncol. 2013 Jun;40(3):286-96. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2013.04.004. Review.

PMID:
23806494
8.

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic.

Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A.

Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5 Suppl):101-4. Review.

PMID:
16194714
9.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, Artibani W, Carroll PR, Costello A, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel VR, Stolzenburg JU, Van der Poel H, Wilson TG, Zattoni F, Mottrie A.

Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.045. Epub 2012 Jun 1. Review.

PMID:
22749852
10.

Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer: a review of the current literature.

Hakimi AA, Feder M, Ghavamian R.

Urol J. 2007 Summer;4(3):130-7. Review.

11.

Radical prostatectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques.

Hegarty NJ, Kaouk JH.

Can J Urol. 2006 Feb;13 Suppl 1:56-61. Review.

PMID:
16526984
12.
13.

Comparison of radical prostatectomy techniques: open, laparoscopic and robotic assisted.

Frota R, Turna B, Barros R, Gill IS.

Int Braz J Urol. 2008 May-Jun;34(3):259-68; discussion 268-9. Review.

14.
15.

Positive surgical margin and perioperative complication rates of primary surgical treatments for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic prostatectomy.

Tewari A, Sooriakumaran P, Bloch DA, Seshadri-Kreaden U, Hebert AE, Wiklund P.

Eur Urol. 2012 Jul;62(1):1-15. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.029. Epub 2012 Feb 24. Review.

PMID:
22405509
16.

Current status of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: how does it compare with other surgical approaches?

Lim SK, Kim KH, Shin TY, Rha KH.

Int J Urol. 2013 Mar;20(3):271-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.03193.x. Epub 2012 Oct 29. Review.

17.

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: do minimally invasive approaches offer significant advantages?

Smith JA Jr, Herrell SD.

J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 10;23(32):8170-5. Review.

PMID:
16278469
18.

Open, laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy: optimizing the surgical approach.

Bivalacqua TJ, Pierorazio PM, Su LM.

Surg Oncol. 2009 Sep;18(3):233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2009.02.009. Epub 2009 Mar 14. Review.

PMID:
19286370
19.

[Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy].

Thomas C, Neisius A, Roos FC, Hampel C, Thüroff JW.

Urologe A. 2015 Feb;54(2):178-82. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3665-3. Review. German.

PMID:
25616764
20.

Perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after open and minimally invasive prostate cancer surgery: experience from Australasia.

Cathcart P, Murphy DG, Moon D, Costello AJ, Frydenberg M.

BJU Int. 2011 Apr;107 Suppl 3:11-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10053.x. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center