Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 182

1.

Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, Lundy JJ, Sloan JA, Revicki DA, Lenderking WR, Cella D, Basch E; ISPOR ePRO Task Force..

Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):419-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00470.x. Epub 2008 Nov 11.

2.

Use of existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments and their modification: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Evaluating and Documenting Content Validity for the Use of Existing Instruments and Their Modification PRO Task Force Report.

Rothman M, Burke L, Erickson P, Leidy NK, Patrick DL, Petrie CD.

Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1075-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00603.x. Epub 2009 Sep 25. Review.

3.

Principles of good practice for budget impact analysis: report of the ISPOR Task Force on good research practices--budget impact analysis.

Mauskopf JA, Sullivan SD, Annemans L, Caro J, Mullins CD, Nuijten M, Orlewska E, Watkins J, Trueman P.

Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):336-47.

4.

Equivalence of electronic and paper administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted between 2007 and 2013.

Muehlhausen W, Doll H, Quadri N, Fordham B, O'Donohoe P, Dogar N, Wild DJ.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Oct 7;13:167. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0362-x. Review.

5.

Using real-world data for coverage and payment decisions: the ISPOR Real-World Data Task Force report.

Garrison LP Jr, Neumann PJ, Erickson P, Marshall D, Mullins CD.

Value Health. 2007 Sep-Oct;10(5):326-35.

6.

Evidence Brief: The Quality of Care Provided by Advanced Practice Nurses.

McCleery E, Christensen V, Peterson K, Humphrey L, Helfand M.

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2014 Sep.

7.

Good research practices for cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials: the ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force report.

Ramsey S, Willke R, Briggs A, Brown R, Buxton M, Chawla A, Cook J, Glick H, Liljas B, Petitti D, Reed S.

Value Health. 2005 Sep-Oct;8(5):521-33. Review.

8.

Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.

Marcano Belisario JS, Jamsek J, Huckvale K, O'Donoghue J, Morrison CP, Car J.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2. Review.

PMID:
26212714
9.

Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of day care for people with severe mental disorders: (1) acute day hospital versus admission; (2) vocational rehabilitation; (3) day hospital versus outpatient care.

Marshall M, Crowther R, Almaraz-Serrano A, Creed F, Sledge W, Kluiter H, Roberts C, Hill E, Wiersma D, Bond GR, Huxley P, Tyrer P.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(21):1-75. Review.

10.
11.

Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.

Steinert Y, Naismith L, Mann K.

Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937. Review.

PMID:
22578043
12.

Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.

Cook JA, Hislop J, Adewuyi TE, Harrild K, Altman DG, Ramsay CR, Fraser C, Buckley B, Fayers P, Harvey I, Briggs AH, Norrie JD, Fergusson D, Ford I, Vale LD.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280. Review.

13.

Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices.

Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Markowitz AJ.

Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001;(43):i-x, 1-668. Review.

14.

Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials II-An ISPOR Good Research Practices Task Force report.

Ramsey SD, Willke RJ, Glick H, Reed SD, Augustovski F, Jonsson B, Briggs A, Sullivan SD.

Value Health. 2015 Mar;18(2):161-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.02.001. Review.

15.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

16.

Outcome measurement in female sexual dysfunction clinical trials: review and recommendations.

Althof SE, Rosen RC, DeRogatis L, Corty E, Quirk F, Symonds T.

J Sex Marital Ther. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):153-66. Review.

PMID:
15859374
17.

Evidence Brief: The Effectiveness Of Mandatory Computer-Based Trainings On Government Ethics, Workplace Harassment, Or Privacy And Information Security-Related Topics.

Peterson K, McCleery E.

VA Evidence-based Synthesis Program Evidence Briefs [Internet]. Washington (DC): Department of Veterans Affairs (US); 2011-.
2014 May.

18.

Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force.

Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, Kilambi V, Mühlbacher A, Regier DA, Bresnahan BW, Kanninen B, Bridges JF.

Value Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;16(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2223.

19.

Systematic review to identify and appraise outcome measures used to evaluate childhood obesity treatment interventions (CoOR): evidence of purpose, application, validity, reliability and sensitivity.

Bryant M, Ashton L, Brown J, Jebb S, Wright J, Roberts K, Nixon J.

Health Technol Assess. 2014 Aug;18(51):1-380. doi: 10.3310/hta18510. Review.

20.

Supplemental Content

Support Center