Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 59

1.

AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.

Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, Treadwell JR, Reston JT, Bass EB, Chang S, Helfand M.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):513-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.009.

PMID:
19595577
2.

AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.

Chou R, Aronson N, Atkins D, Ismaila AS, Santaguida P, Smith DH, Whitlock E, Wilt TJ, Moher D.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 May;63(5):502-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.007. Epub 2008 Sep 26. Review.

PMID:
18823754
3.

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Part 1 of 3. An overview of the GRADE approach and grading quality of evidence about interventions.

Brozek JL, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Lang D, Jaeschke R, Williams JW, Phillips B, Lelgemann M, Lethaby A, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group.

Allergy. 2009 May;64(5):669-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01973.x. Review.

4.

Finding evidence for comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.

Relevo R, Balshem H.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Nov;64(11):1168-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.022. Epub 2011 Jun 17. Review.

PMID:
21684115
5.

GRADE system: new paradigm.

Terracciano L, Brozek J, Compalati E, Schünemann H.

Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Aug;10(4):377-83. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e32833c148b. Review.

PMID:
20610980
6.

Grading the Strength of a Body of Evidence When Assessing Health Care Interventions for the Effective Health Care Program of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: An Update.

Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari M, McDonagh M, Balk E, Whitlock E, Reston J, Bass E, Butler M, Gartlehner G, Hartling L, Kane R, McPheeters M, Morgan L, Morton SC, Viswanathan M, Sista P, Chang S.

Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008-.
2013 Nov 18.

7.

Challenges in systematic reviews of complementary and alternative medicine topics.

Shekelle PG, Morton SC, Suttorp MJ, Buscemi N, Friesen C; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1042-7. Review.

PMID:
15968028
8.

The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. Review.

9.

Better information for better health care: the Evidence-based Practice Center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Atkins D, Fink K, Slutsky J; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; North American Evidence-based Practice Centers.

Ann Intern Med. 2005 Jun 21;142(12 Pt 2):1035-41. Review.

PMID:
15968027
10.

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.

Brozek JL, Akl EA, Jaeschke R, Lang DM, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Helfand M, Ueffing E, Alonso-Coello P, Meerpohl J, Phillips B, Horvath AR, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group.

Allergy. 2009 Aug;64(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02083.x. Epub 2009 May 29. Review.

11.

Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations.

Brożek JL, Akl EA, Compalati E, Kreis J, Terracciano L, Fiocchi A, Ueffing E, Andrews J, Alonso-Coello P, Meerpohl JJ, Lang DM, Jaeschke R, Williams JW Jr, Phillips B, Lethaby A, Bossuyt P, Glasziou P, Helfand M, Watine J, Afilalo M, Welch V, Montedori A, Abraha I, Horvath AR, Bousquet J, Guyatt GH, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group.

Allergy. 2011 May;66(5):588-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2010.02530.x. Epub 2011 Jan 17. Review.

12.

Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations.

Flynn MA, McNeil DA, Maloff B, Mutasingwa D, Wu M, Ford C, Tough SC.

Obes Rev. 2006 Feb;7 Suppl 1:7-66. Review.

PMID:
16371076
13.

Reassessment of evidence synthesis of occupational medicine practice guidelines for interventional pain management.

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Derby R, Schultz DM, Benyamin RM, Prager JP, Hirsch JA.

Pain Physician. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):393-482. Review.

14.
15.

Diagnosis and management of dental caries throughout life.

National Institutes of Health (U.S.).

NIH Consens Statement. 2001 Mar 26-28;18(1):1-23. Review.

PMID:
11699634
16.

Nonsurgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI): grading of evidence in systematic reviews.

Latthe PM, Foon R, Khan K.

BJOG. 2008 Mar;115(4):435-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01629.x. Review.

17.

Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment.

Philips Z, Ginnelly L, Sculpher M, Claxton K, Golder S, Riemsma R, Woolacoot N, Glanville J.

Health Technol Assess. 2004 Sep;8(36):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-158. Review.

18.

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.

Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group; European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group.

Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(27):iii-x, 1-173. Review.

19.

Automated percutaneous lumbar discectomy for the contained herniated lumbar disc: a systematic assessment of evidence.

Hirsch JA, Singh V, Falco FJ, Benyamin RM, Manchikanti L.

Pain Physician. 2009 May-Jun;12(3):601-20. Review.

20.

Assessing "best evidence": issues in grading the quality of studies for systematic reviews.

Lohr KN, Carey TS.

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Sep;25(9):470-9. Review.

PMID:
10481816

Supplemental Content

Support Center