Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 60

1.

Isolated disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery comparing the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass surgery.

Kapoor JR, Gienger AL, Ardehali R, Varghese R, Perez MV, Sundaram V, McDonald KM, Owens DK, Hlatky MA, Bravata DM.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(5):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.001. Review.

2.

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with first-generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Al Ali J, Franck C, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.202. Epub 2014 Apr 16. Review.

3.

Systematic review: the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Perez MV, Varghese R, Kapoor JR, Ardehali R, Owens DK, Hlatky MA.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Nov 20;147(10):703-16. Epub 2007 Oct 15. Review.

PMID:
17938385
4.

What is the optimal revascularization technique for isolated disease of the left anterior descending artery: minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or percutaneous coronary intervention?

Patel AJ, Yates MT, Soppa GK.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;19(1):144-8. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu076. Epub 2014 Mar 25. Review.

PMID:
24667582
5.

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. coronary artery bypass graft surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stents era--an aggregate data meta-analysis of 11,148 patients.

Alam M, Huang HD, Shahzad SA, Kar B, Virani SS, Rogers PA, Paniagua D, Bozkurt B, Palacios I, Kleiman NS, Jneid H.

Circ J. 2013;77(2):372-82. Epub 2012 Oct 31. Review.

6.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the treatment of diabetic patients with multi-vessel coronary disease: a meta-analysis.

Zhang F, Yang Y, Hu D, Lei H, Wang Y.

Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Aug;97(2):178-84. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2012.03.020. Epub 2012 Apr 16. Review.

PMID:
22513345
7.
8.

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.

Deb S, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT, Tsubota H, Hill S, Fremes SE.

JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718. Review.

PMID:
24240936
10.

Left main coronary artery stenosis: a meta-analysis of drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting.

Athappan G, Patvardhan E, Tuzcu ME, Ellis S, Whitlow P, Kapadia SR.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Dec;6(12):1219-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.07.008. Review.

11.

Coronary angioplasty versus CABG: review of randomized trials.

Andrade PJ, Medeiros MM, Andrade AT, Lima AA.

Arq Bras Cardiol. 2011 Sep;97(3):e60-9. Review. English, Portuguese.

12.
14.

A meta-analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

Naik H, White AJ, Chakravarty T, Forrester J, Fontana G, Kar S, Shah PK, Weiss RE, Makkar R.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Aug;2(8):739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.05.020. Review.

15.

Comparing cost aspects of coronary artery bypass graft surgery with coronary artery stenting.

Birim Ö, Bogers AJ, Kappetein AP.

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2012 Oct;53(5):641-50. Epub 2012 Jan 17. Review.

PMID:
22252542
16.

Percutaneous coronary invervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis.

Smit Y, Vlayen J, Koppenaal H, Eefting F, Kappetein AP, Mariani MA.

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;149(3):831-8.e1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.112. Epub 2014 Nov 1. Review.

17.

Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention for single-vessel disease: a meta-analysis of 2885 patients.

Deppe AC, Liakopoulos OJ, Kuhn EW, Slottosch I, Scherner M, Choi YH, Rahmanian PB, Wahlers T.

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Mar;47(3):397-406; discussion 406. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu285. Epub 2014 Aug 6. Review.

PMID:
25100715
18.

A meta-analysis of randomized trials for repeat revascularization following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Takagi H, Mizuno Y, Niwa M, Goto SN, Umemoto T; ALICE (All-Literature Investigation of Cardiovascular Evidence) Group.

Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Nov;17(5):878-80. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt316. Epub 2013 Jul 21. Review.

19.

Minimally invasive direct coronary bypass compared with percutaneous coronary intervention for left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis.

Wang XW, Qu C, Huang C, Xiang XY, Lu ZQ.

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Aug 5;11(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13019-016-0512-1. Review.

20.

Unprotected left main coronary disease and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a contemporary review and argument for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Lee MS, Bokhoor P, Park SJ, Kim YH, Stone GW, Sheiban I, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sillano D, Tobis J, Kandzari DE.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Aug;3(8):791-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.06.005. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center