Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 48

1.

Body awareness: construct and self-report measures.

Mehling WE, Gopisetty V, Daubenmier J, Price CJ, Hecht FM, Stewart A.

PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5614. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005614. Epub 2009 May 19. Review.

2.
3.

A psychometric systematic review of self-report instruments to identify anxiety in pregnancy.

Evans K, Spiby H, Morrell CJ.

J Adv Nurs. 2015 Sep;71(9):1986-2001. doi: 10.1111/jan.12649. Epub 2015 Mar 26. Review.

PMID:
25818179
4.

Self-efficacy instruments for patients with chronic diseases suffer from methodological limitations--a systematic review.

Frei A, Svarin A, Steurer-Stey C, Puhan MA.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Sep 26;7:86. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-86. Review.

5.

A systematic review of the psychometric properties of self-report research utilization measures used in healthcare.

Squires JE, Estabrooks CA, O'Rourke HM, Gustavsson P, Newburn-Cook CV, Wallin L.

Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 27;6:83. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-83. Review.

6.

A systematic review evaluating the psychometric properties of measures of social inclusion.

Cordier R, Milbourn B, Martin R, Buchanan A, Chung D, Speyer R.

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 9;12(6):e0179109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179109. eCollection 2017. Review.

7.

Psychometric properties and feasibility of instruments used to assess awareness of deficits after acquired brain injury: a systematic review.

Smeets SM, Ponds RW, Verhey FR, van Heugten CM.

J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(6):433-42. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182242f98. Review.

PMID:
21897287
8.

A review of the psychometric properties of breastfeeding assessment tools.

Ho YJ, McGrath JM.

J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010 Jul-Aug;39(4):386-400. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01153.x. Review.

PMID:
20629926
9.

Measuring self-care in patients with hypertension: a systematic review of literature.

Han HR, Song HJ, Nguyen T, Kim MT.

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Jan-Feb;29(1):55-67. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3182775fd1. Review.

PMID:
23348221
10.

Systematic review of the psychometric properties and theoretical grounding of instruments evaluating self-care in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Caro-Bautista J, Martín-Santos FJ, Morales-Asencio JM.

J Adv Nurs. 2014 Jun;70(6):1209-27. doi: 10.1111/jan.12298. Epub 2013 Nov 17. Review.

PMID:
24237156
11.

Measuring self-care in chronic heart failure: a review of the psychometric properties of clinical instruments.

Cameron J, Worrall-Carter L, Driscoll A, Stewart S.

J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2009 Nov-Dec;24(6):E10-22. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181b5660f. Review.

PMID:
19786882
12.

The measurement and monitoring of surgical adverse events.

Bruce J, Russell EM, Mollison J, Krukowski ZH.

Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(22):1-194. Review.

13.

[Caregiver burden in relatives of persons with schizophrenia: an overview of measure instruments].

Reine G, Lancon C, Simeoni MC, Duplan S, Auquier P.

Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):137-47. Review. French.

PMID:
14567165
14.

A comprehensive systematic review of the development process of 104 patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for physical activity in chronically ill and elderly people.

Frei A, Williams K, Vetsch A, Dobbels F, Jacobs L, Rüdell K, Puhan MA; PROactive consortium.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011 Dec 20;9:116. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-9-116. Review.

15.

Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application.

Cook DA, Beckman TJ.

Am J Med. 2006 Feb;119(2):166.e7-16. Review.

PMID:
16443422
16.

Measuring health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: A systematic review of the most used questionnaires and their validity.

Hamoen EH, De Rooij M, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO, Rovers MM.

Urol Oncol. 2015 Feb;33(2):69.e19-28. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.10.005. Epub 2014 Jan 13. Review.

PMID:
24433753
17.

Postural control and fear of falling assessment in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review of instruments, international classification of functioning, disability and health linkage, and measurement properties.

Oliveira CC, Lee A, Granger CL, Miller KJ, Irving LB, Denehy L.

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1784-1799.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.04.012. Epub 2013 Apr 28. Review.

PMID:
23632285
18.

The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.

Bowling A, Rowe G, Lambert N, Waddington M, Mahtani KR, Kenten C, Howe A, Francis SA.

Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300. Review.

19.

Quality assessment of ophthalmic questionnaires: review and recommendations.

Khadka J, McAlinden C, Pesudovs K.

Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Aug;90(8):720-44. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000001. Review.

PMID:
23873034
20.

Assessing psychosocial well-being of adolescents: a systematic review of measuring instruments.

Tsang KL, Wong PY, Lo SK.

Child Care Health Dev. 2012 Sep;38(5):629-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01355.x. Epub 2011 Dec 14. Review.

PMID:
22168129

Supplemental Content

Support Center