Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 23

1.

Coronary artery bypass surgery compared with percutaneous coronary interventions for multivessel disease: a collaborative analysis of individual patient data from ten randomised trials.

Hlatky MA, Boothroyd DB, Bravata DM, Boersma E, Booth J, Brooks MM, Carrié D, Clayton TC, Danchin N, Flather M, Hamm CW, Hueb WA, Kähler J, Kelsey SF, King SB, Kosinski AS, Lopes N, McDonald KM, Rodriguez A, Serruys P, Sigwart U, Stables RH, Owens DK, Pocock SJ.

Lancet. 2009 Apr 4;373(9670):1190-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60552-3.

PMID:
19303634
2.
3.

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.

Deb S, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT, Tsubota H, Hill S, Fremes SE.

JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718. Review.

PMID:
24240936
4.

Meta-analysis of 14 trials comparing bypass grafting vs drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.

De Luca G, Schaffer A, Verdoia M, Suryapranata H.

Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014 Apr;24(4):344-54. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.11.002. Review.

PMID:
24373711
5.

Prolonged effectiveness of coronary artery bypass surgery versus drug-eluting stents in diabetics with multi-vessel disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ariyaratne TV, Ademi Z, Yap CH, Billah B, Rosenfeldt F, Yan BP, Reid CM.

Int J Cardiol. 2014 Sep 20;176(2):346-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.072. Review.

PMID:
25127976
6.

Isolated disease of the proximal left anterior descending artery comparing the effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass surgery.

Kapoor JR, Gienger AL, Ardehali R, Varghese R, Perez MV, Sundaram V, McDonald KM, Owens DK, Hlatky MA, Bravata DM.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Oct;1(5):483-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.001. Review.

7.

Systematic review: the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Bravata DM, Gienger AL, McDonald KM, Sundaram V, Perez MV, Varghese R, Kapoor JR, Ardehali R, Owens DK, Hlatky MA.

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Nov 20;147(10):703-16. Review.

PMID:
17938385
8.

Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease?

Mehta RH, Lopes RD, Ballotta A, Frigiola A, Sketch MH Jr, Bossone E, Bates ER.

Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.035. Review.

PMID:
20102880
9.

Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients with diabetes: implications of the FREEDOM trial.

Burgess SN, Mussap CJ, French JK.

Clin Ther. 2013 Aug;35(8):1069-75. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.07.427. Review.

PMID:
23973040
10.
11.

Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with first-generation drug-eluting stents: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Al Ali J, Franck C, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ.

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 May;7(5):497-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.12.202. Review.

12.
14.

Diabetes and coronary revascularization.

Flaherty JD, Davidson CJ.

JAMA. 2005 Mar 23;293(12):1501-8. Review.

PMID:
15784875
16.

Severe coronary artery disease: is there a place for percutaneous coronary intervention?

Herzog WR, Farb A.

Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2009 Jun;119(6):397-402. Review.

17.

Bypass grafting versus percutaneous intervention in multivessel coronary disease: the current state.

Sipahi I.

Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015 Feb;17(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11886-014-0558-4. Review.

PMID:
25618303
18.
19.
20.

Percutaneous coronary intervention vs. medical therapy: what are the implications for women?

Haymart MR, Dickfeld T, Nass C, Blumenthal RS.

J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2002 May;11(4):347-55. Review.

PMID:
12150497

Supplemental Content

Support Center