Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 18

1.

Prostate weight and early potency in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Ahlering TE, Kaplan AG, Yee DS, Skarecky DW.

Urology. 2008 Dec;72(6):1263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.05.055. Epub 2008 Aug 13.

PMID:
18701150
2.

Predicting erectile function outcome in men after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Kilminster S, Müller S, Menon M, Joseph JV, Ralph DJ, Patel HR.

BJU Int. 2012 Aug;110(3):422-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10757.x. Epub 2011 Dec 19. Review.

3.

Nerve-sparing techniques in open and laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Rodriguez E, Melamud O, Ahlering TE.

Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2008 Mar;8(3):475-9. doi: 10.1586/14737140.8.3.475. Review.

PMID:
18366294
4.

Techniques of nerve-sparing and potency outcomes following robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Chauhan S, Coelho RF, Rocco B, Palmer KJ, Orvieto MA, Patel VR.

Int Braz J Urol. 2010 May-Jun;36(3):259-72. Review.

5.

Role of robotics for prostate cancer.

McCullough TC, Barret E, Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Galiano M, Vallancien G.

Curr Opin Urol. 2009 Jan;19(1):65-8. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32831aedcf. Review.

PMID:
19057219
6.

Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies.

Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, Cestari A, Galfano A, Graefen M, Guazzoni G, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Patel V, Rassweiler J, Van Poppel H.

Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1037-63. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.036. Epub 2009 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
19185977
7.

Neuroanatomic basis for traction-free preservation of the neural hammock during athermal robotic radical prostatectomy.

Srivastava A, Grover S, Sooriakumaran P, Tan G, Takenaka A, Tewari AK.

Curr Opin Urol. 2011 Jan;21(1):49-59. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834120e9. Review.

PMID:
21099688
8.

Penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: role of early intervention and chronic therapy.

Zippe CD, Pahlajani G.

Urol Clin North Am. 2007 Nov;34(4):601-18, viii. Review.

PMID:
17983900
9.

Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: techniques and clinical considerations.

Gontero P, Kirby RS.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2005;8(2):133-9. Review.

PMID:
15711608
10.

Robotic prostatectomy: a review of outcomes compared with laparoscopic and open approaches.

Berryhill R Jr, Jhaveri J, Yadav R, Leung R, Rao S, El-Hakim A, Tewari A.

Urology. 2008 Jul;72(1):15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.038. Epub 2008 Apr 24. Review.

PMID:
18436288
11.

Recovery of sexual function after prostate cancer treatment.

Donatucci CF, Greenfield JM.

Curr Opin Urol. 2006 Nov;16(6):444-8. Review.

PMID:
17053525
12.

Lymph node dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: where do we stand?

Silberstein JL, Derweesh IH, Kane CJ.

Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2009;12(3):227-32. doi: 10.1038/pcan.2009.17. Epub 2009 Jun 23. Review.

PMID:
19546882
14.

Artery sparing radical prostatectomy--myth or reality?

Mulhall JP, Secin FP, Guillonneau B.

J Urol. 2008 Mar;179(3):827-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.10.021. Epub 2008 Jan 25. Review.

PMID:
18221962
15.

Hope springs eternal: cavernosal nerve regeneration.

Syme DB, Corcoran NM, Bouchier-Hayes DM, Costello AJ.

BJU Int. 2006 Jan;97(1):17-21. Review.

16.

Intrafascial nerve-sparing laproscopic radical prostatectomy: do we really preserve relevant nerve-fibres?

Rassweiler J.

Eur Urol. 2006 Jun;49(6):955-7. Epub 2006 Apr 19. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
16647805
17.

[Should accessory pudendal arteries be spared in radical prostatectomy?].

Droupy S, Breault G.

Prog Urol. 2006 Feb;16(1 Suppl):3-6. Review. French. No abstract available.

PMID:
16615310
18.

Prostatic weight and zinc concentration.

Tisell LE, Leissner KH.

Prog Clin Biol Res. 1984;145:333-44. Review. No abstract available.

PMID:
6371830

Supplemental Content

Support Center