Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 7

1.

Quantitative accuracy of PET/CT for image-based kinetic analysis.

Seo Y, Teo BK, Hadi M, Schreck C, Bacharach SL, Hasegawa BH.

Med Phys. 2008 Jul;35(7):3086-9.

2.

Quantitative approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT studies (dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients.

Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pan L, Strauss LG.

Cancer Imaging. 2012 Sep 28;12:283-9. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0033. Review.

3.

Assessment of atherosclerosis in large vessel walls: A comprehensive review of FDG-PET/CT image acquisition protocols and methods for uptake quantification.

Gholami S, Salavati A, Houshmand S, Werner TJ, Alavi A.

J Nucl Cardiol. 2015 Jun;22(3):468-79. doi: 10.1007/s12350-015-0069-8. Epub 2015 Apr 1. Review.

PMID:
25827619
4.

Quantitative assessment of dynamic PET imaging data in cancer imaging.

Muzi M, O'Sullivan F, Mankoff DA, Doot RK, Pierce LA, Kurland BF, Linden HM, Kinahan PE.

Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1203-15. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 Jul 21. Review.

5.

Spectral Analysis of Dynamic PET Studies: A Review of 20 Years of Method Developments and Applications.

Veronese M, Rizzo G, Bertoldo A, Turkheimer FE.

Comput Math Methods Med. 2016;2016:7187541. doi: 10.1155/2016/7187541. Epub 2016 Dec 5. Review.

6.

Towards enhanced PET quantification in clinical oncology.

Zaidi H, Karakatsanis N.

Br J Radiol. 2018 Jan;91(1081):20170508. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170508. Epub 2017 Nov 22. Review.

PMID:
29164924
7.

Radioembolization and the Dynamic Role of (90)Y PET/CT.

Pasciak AS, Bourgeois AC, McKinney JM, Chang TT, Osborne DR, Acuff SN, Bradley YC.

Front Oncol. 2014 Feb 27;4:38. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00038. eCollection 2014. Review.

Supplemental Content

Support Center