Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 45

1.

Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.

Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Oct;61(10):991-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.010. Epub 2008 Jun 6.

PMID:
18538991
2.

Invited review: Use of meta-analysis in animal health and reproduction: methods and applications.

Lean IJ, Rabiee AR, Duffield TF, Dohoo IR.

J Dairy Sci. 2009 Aug;92(8):3545-65. doi: 10.3168/jds.2009-2140. Review.

PMID:
19620636
3.

Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the 'trim and fill' method.

Jennions MD, Møller AP.

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 May;77(2):211-22. Review.

PMID:
12056747
4.

How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Leucht S, Kissling W, Davis JM.

Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2009 Jun;119(6):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01388.x. Review.

PMID:
19469725
5.

Publication bias in meta-analysis: its causes and consequences.

Thornton A, Lee P.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):207-16. Review.

PMID:
10729693
6.

Factors affecting the comparability of meta-analyses and largest trials results in perinatology.

Villar J, Piaggio G, Carroli G, Donner A.

J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Sep;50(9):997-1002. Review.

PMID:
9363033
7.

Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.

Ioannidis JP.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):951-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.00986.x. Review.

PMID:
19018930
8.

Exploring and accounting for publication bias in mental health: a brief overview of methods.

Mavridis D, Salanti G.

Evid Based Ment Health. 2014 Feb;17(1):11-5. doi: 10.1136/eb-2013-101700. Review.

PMID:
24477532
9.

A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data.

Wiebe N, Vandermeer B, Platt RW, Klassen TP, Moher D, Barrowman NJ.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;59(4):342-53. Review.

PMID:
16549255
10.

Novel methods to deal with publication biases: secondary analysis of antidepressant trials in the FDA trial registry database and related journal publications.

Moreno SG, Sutton AJ, Turner EH, Abrams KR, Cooper NJ, Palmer TM, Ades AE.

BMJ. 2009 Aug 7;339:b2981. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2981. Review.

11.

A consumer's guide to meta-analysis.

LaValley M.

Arthritis Care Res. 1997 Jun;10(3):208-13. Review.

PMID:
9335633
12.

Publication bias is underreported in systematic reviews published in high-impact-factor journals: metaepidemiologic study.

Onishi A, Furukawa TA.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1320-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.07.002. Epub 2014 Sep 4. Review.

13.

A systematic review evaluating the potential for bias and the methodological quality of meta-analyses in vaccinology.

De Vito C, Manzoli L, Marzuillo C, Anastasi D, Boccia A, Villari P.

Vaccine. 2007 Dec 17;25(52):8794-806. Epub 2007 Nov 5. Review.

PMID:
18035456
14.

Assessing small study effects and publication bias in orthodontic meta-analyses: a meta-epidemiological study.

Papageorgiou SN, Papadopoulos MA, Athanasiou AE.

Clin Oral Investig. 2014 May;18(4):1031-44. doi: 10.1007/s00784-014-1196-3. Epub 2014 Feb 14. Review.

PMID:
24526347
15.

Assessment of publication bias for the surgeon scientist.

Mahid SS, Qadan M, Hornung CA, Galandiuk S.

Br J Surg. 2008 Aug;95(8):943-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6302. Review.

PMID:
18618864
16.

Calculating prevalence of hepatitis B in India: using population weights to look for publication bias in conventional meta-analysis.

Batham A, Gupta MA, Rastogi P, Garg S, Sreenivas V, Puliyel JM.

Indian J Pediatr. 2009 Dec;76(12):1247-57. doi: 10.1007/s12098-009-0246-3. Epub 2010 Jan 28. Review.

PMID:
20108060
17.

Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.

Huf W, Kalcher K, Pail G, Friedrich ME, Filzmoser P, Kasper S.

World J Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;12(3):188-200. doi: 10.3109/15622975.2010.551544. Epub 2011 Mar 4. Review.

PMID:
21375365
18.
19.

A case study of publication bias in an influential series of reviews of drug education.

McCambridge J.

Drug Alcohol Rev. 2007 Sep;26(5):463-8. Review.

PMID:
17701508
20.

Meta-analysis of repeated measures study designs.

Peters JL, Mengersen KL.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):941-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01010.x. Review.

PMID:
19018929

Supplemental Content

Support Center