Format
Sort by

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 40

1.

Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality.

Hughes WO, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FL.

Science. 2008 May 30;320(5880):1213-6. doi: 10.1126/science.1156108.

2.

Kin selection versus sexual selection: why the ends do not meet.

Boomsma JJ.

Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R673-83. Review.

3.

Lifetime monogamy and the evolution of eusociality.

Boomsma JJ.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 12;364(1533):3191-207. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0101. Review.

4.

Haploidploidy and the evolution of the social insect.

Trivers RL, Hare H.

Science. 1976 Jan 23;191(4224):249-63. Review.

PMID:
1108197
5.

Natural selection drives the evolution of ant life cycles.

Wilson EO, Nowak MA.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Sep 2;111(35):12585-90. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405550111. Review.

6.

A defense of sociobiology.

Foster KR.

Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2009;74:403-18. doi: 10.1101/sqb.2009.74.041. Review.

PMID:
20375319
7.

A conceptual model for the origin of worker behaviour and adaptation of eusociality.

Hunt JH.

J Evol Biol. 2012 Jan;25(1):1-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02421.x. Review.

8.

Hamilton's rule and the causes of social evolution.

Bourke AF.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014 Mar 31;369(1642):20130362. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0362. Review.

9.

Multilevel selection and social evolution of insect societies.

Korb J, Heinze J.

Naturwissenschaften. 2004 Jun;91(6):291-304. Review.

PMID:
15241605
10.

Evolution of social behaviour in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata: do we need to look beyond kin selection?

Gadagkar R.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Feb 5;371(1687):20150094. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0094. Review.

PMID:
26729933
11.

The validity and value of inclusive fitness theory.

Bourke AF.

Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Nov 22;278(1723):3313-20. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2011.1465. Review.

12.

Altruism, spite, and greenbeards.

West SA, Gardner A.

Science. 2010 Mar 12;327(5971):1341-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1178332. Review.

PMID:
20223978
13.

Beyond promiscuity: mate-choice commitments in social breeding.

Boomsma JJ.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Jan 21;368(1613):20120050. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0050. Review.

14.

Demographic mechanisms for the evolution of long life in social insects.

Carey JR.

Exp Gerontol. 2001 Apr;36(4-6):713-22. Review.

PMID:
11295510
15.

Eusociality: origin and consequences.

Wilson EO, Hölldobler B.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Sep 20;102(38):13367-71. Review. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 1;102(44):16119.

16.

Is sociobiology reactionary? The political implications of inclusive-fitness theory.

Masters RD.

Q Rev Biol. 1982 Sep;57(3):275-92. Review.

PMID:
6755531
17.
18.

The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Pizzari T, Gardner A.

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2012 Aug 19;367(1600):2314-23. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0281. Review.

19.

The evolution of male traits in social insects.

Boomsma JJ, Baer B, Heinze J.

Annu Rev Entomol. 2005;50:395-420. Review.

PMID:
15822204
20.

Evo-devo and the evolution of social behavior.

Toth AL, Robinson GE.

Trends Genet. 2007 Jul;23(7):334-41. Review.

PMID:
17509723
Items per page

Supplemental Content

Support Center