Format
Sort by
Items per page

Send to

Choose Destination

Links from PubMed

Items: 1 to 20 of 65

1.

Surgical outcomes research: a progression from performance audits, to assessment of administrative databases, to prospective risk-adjusted analysis - how far have we come?

Morrato EH, Dillon P, Ziegler M.

Curr Opin Pediatr. 2008 Jun;20(3):320-5. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0b013e3283005857. Review.

PMID:
18475103
2.

Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--the perspective of critical care.

LaRovere JM, Jeffries HE, Sachdeva RC, Rice TB, Wetzel RC, Cooper DS, Bird GL, Ghanayem NS, Checchia PA, Chang AC, Wessel DL.

Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:130-6. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002886. Review.

PMID:
19063783
3.

The case against volume as a measure of quality of surgical care.

Khuri SF, Henderson WG.

World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1222-9. Review.

PMID:
16151664
4.

Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand.

Watters DA, Green AJ, van Rij A.

ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;76(1-2):78-83. Review.

PMID:
16483303
5.
6.

The holy Grail of surgical quality Improvement: process measures or risk-adjusted outcomes?

Rogers SO Jr.

Am Surg. 2006 Nov;72(11):1046-50; discussion 1061-9, 1133-48. Review.

PMID:
17120947
7.

Safety, quality, and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Khuri SF.

Am Surg. 2006 Nov;72(11):994-8; discussion 1021-30, 1133-48. Review.

PMID:
17120939
8.

Does surgical subspecialty care come with a higher price?

Snow BW.

Curr Opin Pediatr. 2005 Jun;17(3):407-8. Review.

PMID:
15891435
9.

Nomenclature and databases for the surgical treatment of congenital cardiac disease--an updated primer and an analysis of opportunities for improvement.

Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Mavroudis C, Backer CL, Lacour-Gayet FG, Tchervenkov CI, Franklin RC, BĂ©land MJ, Jenkins KJ, Walters H, Bacha EA, Maruszewski B, Kurosawa H, Clarke DR, Gaynor JW, Spray TL, Stellin G, Ebels T, Krogmann ON, Aiello VD, Colan SD, Weinberg P, Giroud JM, Everett A, Wernovsky G, Elliott MJ, Edwards FH.

Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:38-62. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108003028. Review.

PMID:
19063775
10.

Audit, quality control, and performance in thoracic surgery: a North American perspective.

Tong BC, Harpole DH Jr.

Thorac Surg Clin. 2007 Aug;17(3):379-86. Review.

PMID:
18072358
11.

Databases for assessing the outcomes of the treatment of patients with congenital and paediatric cardiac disease--a comparison of administrative and clinical data.

Welke KF, Karamlou T, Diggs BS.

Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:137-44. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002837. Review.

PMID:
19063784
12.

Past accomplishments and future directions: risk prevention in anesthesia and surgery.

Stoelting RK, Khuri SF.

Anesthesiol Clin. 2006 Jun;24(2):235-53, v. Review.

PMID:
16927928
13.

Candidate quality of care indicators for localized bladder cancer.

Cooperberg MR, Porter MP, Konety BR.

Urol Oncol. 2009 Jul-Aug;27(4):435-42. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.01.012. Review.

PMID:
19573775
14.

Risk-adjusted outcomes and perioperative care.

Napolitano LM, Bass BL.

Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Dec;85(6):1341-6, xiv. Review.

PMID:
16326214
15.

Stratification of complexity: the Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 method and the Aristotle Complexity Score--past, present, and future.

Jacobs ML, Jacobs JP, Jenkins KJ, Gauvreau K, Clarke DR, Lacour-Gayet F.

Cardiol Young. 2008 Dec;18 Suppl 2:163-8. doi: 10.1017/S1047951108002904. Review.

PMID:
19063787
16.

Clinical audits: why and for whom.

Boult M, Maddern GJ.

ANZ J Surg. 2007 Jul;77(7):572-8. Review.

PMID:
17610696
17.

Administrative data based patient safety research: a critical review.

Zhan C, Miller MR.

Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Dec;12 Suppl 2:ii58-63. Review.

18.

Linking processes and outcomes to improve surgical performance: a new approach to morbidity and mortality peer review.

Pine M, Fry DE.

Am Surg. 2006 Nov;72(11):1115-9; discussion 1126-48. Review.

PMID:
17120958
19.

Systematic review of the quality of surgical mortality monitoring.

Russell EM, Bruce J, Krukowski ZH.

Br J Surg. 2003 May;90(5):527-32. Review.

PMID:
12734856
20.

[Relation between activity volume and surgeon's results: myth or reality?].

Slim K, Flamein R, Chipponi J.

Ann Chir. 2002 Sep;127(7):502-11. Review. French.

PMID:
12404844

Supplemental Content

Support Center